The interpretation timeline
Matthew 11:19 Douay-Rheims

The Son of man came eating and drinking, and they say: Behold a man that is a glutton and a wine drinker, a friend of publicans and sinners. And wisdom is justified by her children.

A.D. 367 – 1863 8 witnesses 9 excerpts

Patristic

before A.D. 750
367
A.D.
Hilary of Poitiers Patristic
c. A.D. 310–367
“Mystically; Neither did the preaching of John bend the Jews, to whom the law seemed burdensome in prescribing meats and drinks, difficult and grievous, having in it sin which He calls having a dæmon—for from the difficulty of keeping it they must sin under the Law. Nor again did the preaching of the Gospel with freedom of life in Christ please them—by which the hardships and burdens of the Law were remitted, and publicans and sinners only believed in it. Thus, then, so many and so great warnings of all kinds having been offered them in vain, they are neither justified by the Law, and they are cast off from grace; Wisdom, therefore, is justified of her children, by those, that is, who seize the kingdom of heaven by the justification of faith, confessing the work of wisdom to be just, that it has transferred its gift from the rebellious to the faithful.”
Source
407
A.D.
John Chrysostom Patristic
A.D. 347–407
“What excuse then shall be given for them? Therefore He adds, And wisdom is justified of her children; that is, though ye were not convinced, yet have ye nothing whereof to accuse me, as also of the Father the Prophet speaks, That thou mightest be justified in thy sayings. (Ps. 51:4.) For though nought be effected in you by that goodness which is extended to you, yet He fulfils all His part that you may not have the shadow of excuse for your ungrateful doubt.”
Source
420
A.D.
Jerome Patristic
c. A.D. 347–420
“Wisdom is justified of her children, i. e. The dispensation or doctrine of God, or Christ Himself who is the power and wisdom of God, is proved by the Apostles, who are His children, to have done righteously.”
430
A.D.
Augustine of Hippo Patristic
A.D. 354–430
“(Quæst. Ev. ii. 11.) Or, Wisdom is justified of her children, because the holy Apostles understood that the kingdom of God was not in meat and drink, but in patient enduring; such persons neither does abundance lift up, nor want cast down, but as Paul spoke, I know how to abound, and to suffer want. (Phil. 4:12)”

Scholastic

c. 1100 – 1500
1256
A.D.
Thomas Aquinas Catholic
1225–1274
“But here he breaks forth into a rebuke of the crowds. And first he poses a question; second, a certain comparison; third, he explains it. He proceeds thus. Thus John is compared to Elijah by reason of office, but to whom shall I compare this generation? And why does he say this here? He says this as someone does when he has done for another whatever good he could, and that one is ungrateful, so that he does not know to whom to compare him; thus the Lord had done every good thing for this generation; hence Isaiah 5:4: "What more ought I to have done for my vineyard, that I have not done for it?" To whom then shall I be able to compare so great a malice? It should be noted that "generation" in Scripture is sometimes taken for a gathering of the good, sometimes of the wicked, sometimes of both. For a gathering of the good, as in Psalm 111:2: "the generation of the upright shall be blessed." For a wicked gathering, below in chapter 12:39, where it is said "an evil and perverse generation." For both, Ecclesiastes 1:4, where it is said: "One generation passes away, and another generation comes, but the earth stands forever." "He is like children sitting in the marketplace," etc. Here he sets forth a certain comparison; and it can be explained according to the plain sense of the letter, or according to the mystical sense. First he sets forth the comparison about the children; second he applies it, at the place "John came neither eating nor drinking," etc. For it should be noted that it is natural to man to seek delights, and he always seeks them, and unless he is drawn away by cares, he immediately falls into evil delights; but children do not have cares, and therefore they occupy themselves with what is fitting for them, that is, playing. Likewise it should be noted that man is naturally a social being, and this because by nature one needs another, hence he delights in companionship; hence the Philosopher, Politics I: "every man who is solitary is either better than man, and is a god; or worse than man, and is a beast." Hence it is said "sitting in the marketplace," because no one wishes to play by himself, but in the marketplace, where a gathering of many takes place. Likewise it should be noted that it is natural to man that his delight be in some representation, hence if we see something well carved, which represents well what it ought, then we delight; therefore children, who delight in games, always make their games with some representation, either of war, or of the like. Likewise it should be noted that all the affections of the soul terminate in two passions, namely either in joy, or in mourning. "Who, crying out," etc. This is to be seen thus. Let us suppose that there are children on one side, and others on the other, such that some are to sing, others to dance; that these do one thing, and the others respond to them. If these were to sing, and those did not respond to them according to their form, they would be wronged by them, hence they say, "we have piped to you, and you have not danced." Likewise nothing so changes the mind as song; hence Boethius recounts in his work on music concerning a certain man who was quarreling with another before Pythagoras, and by song others were speaking to him. Then Pythagoras had the song changed, and he grew calm; hence all were trained in music. Therefore it should be noted that a certain song is for the sake of joy, as is found in Ecclesiasticus 40:20: "wine and music make the heart glad"; therefore it is said "we have piped," that is, we have sung a song of joy, and you have not danced. Likewise it is customary that just as some are moved to joy, so some are moved to weeping; hence Jeremiah 9:17: "call for the mourning women, and let them take up a lamentation over us," etc. Therefore they say "we have mourned," that is, we have made mournful songs, and you have not lamented. Mystically, by the children is signified the people of the old law, among whom some were provokers to spiritual joy, as David, Psalm 32:1: "rejoice, you just, in the Lord," and some to mourning, as Joel 2:13: "turn to the Lord with all your heart, in fasting, weeping, and mourning," etc. Hence they can say, "we have piped," that is, we have incited you to spiritual gladness, and you have not received it; "we have mourned," that is, we have invited you to penance, and you have not agreed. "John came," etc. Here he applies the comparison. And first he applies it; second he assigns the reasons. Men are drawn to a good life in two ways: for some by the appearance of holiness, but some by the way of familiarity. The Lord and John divided the two ways between themselves. John — or rather the Lord through John — chose the way of austerity; through himself he chose the way of gentleness; and yet through neither were they converted. Hence he says, "John came neither eating nor drinking"; and this according to the letter, because he was greatly abstinent, and they say, "He has a demon," just as hypocrites turn good into evil. "The Son of Man came eating and drinking," that is, using foods without distinction, and it avails him nothing, because you do not believe, but rather you say, "Behold a gluttonous man, a wine drinker, a friend of publicans"; against that saying of Proverbs 23:20: "be not in the feasts of great drinkers," etc. Here it should be noted that whoever would heed the sayings of men would never do anything well; Ecclesiastes 11:4: "he who observes the winds does not sow, and he who considers the clouds will never reap." But here is a question. Why did the Lord choose for himself the gentler life, and show through John the harsher one? The reason is this: because the Lord confirmed his acts by miracles, but John did not perform them; therefore, if he had no excellence, his testimony would not be approved, just as we see in the saints, because one has excellence in one thing, another in another; as Augustine had excellence in doctrine, Martin in miracles. Likewise, another reason: because John was a mere man, therefore he abstained himself from carnal desires; but Christ was God, therefore if he led a life of austerity, he would not be shown to be man; therefore he took up the human life more fully. Likewise John was the end of the Old Testament, upon which heavy burdens were imposed; but Christ was the beginning of the new law, which proceeds by the way of gentleness. "And wisdom is justified," etc. This can be read in two ways. In one way, by referring it back to both what was said of John and of Christ; and then the sense is: when a man does what he ought, and another is not corrected, then he saves his own soul, and is justified in his words. "Wisdom is justified," that is, the Son of God, or Christ — that is, she appeared just to her children, because she showed to the Jews what she owed: abstinence through John, gentleness through Christ. Or it can be said otherwise. Thus let the children of the Devil say that he is a glutton and a wine-drinker; but the children of wisdom understand that life does not consist in food and drink, but in evenness of soul, using food according to place and time, and likewise abstaining when it is fitting, so that they neither exceed in much nor fall short in little, as the Apostle says to the Philippians 4:12: "everywhere, and in all things I am instructed, both to be full and to be hungry, both to abound and to suffer want." Therefore he would not seem to show full righteousness if he abstained entirely, because it would be believed that the whole of righteousness lay in abstinence; but it does not consist in this, but in evenness of soul. And note that he says "wisdom," because to use food, or to abstain, according to the moderation of wisdom, is that one abstain when he ought, and where he ought.”

Post-Reformation

c. 1650 – 1900
1771
A.D.
John Gill Reformed
1697–1771
“Then began he to upbraid the cities,.... When he had sent forth his disciples to preach, and had been in these several cities hereafter mentioned himself, and had taught and preached in them, and confirmed his doctrine by many wonderful works; when he had observed how ill they had used both John and himself, representing the one as having a devil, and the other as a licentious person; when they could not be pleased with the ministry of the one, nor of the other, he very seasonably and righteously began to reproach them with their ungenerous treatment of him, their ingratitude to him, their unbelief in him, the hardness and impenitence of their hearts; which could not be moved to repent of their evil ways, and believe in him, and acknowledge him as the Messiah, by all the instructions he gave them, and miracles he wrought among them: for the cities he has a view to, were such, wherein most of his mighty works were done; the most for number, and the greatest in their kind; as particularly at Capernaum; where he cured the centurion's servant, recovered Peter's wife's mother from a fever, healed the man sick of a palsy, raised Jairus's daughter from the dead, made whole the woman that had a bloody issue, opened the eyes of two blind men, and cast out a devil from a dumb man, possessed with one: all these, and more, he did in this one city, and therefore he might justly upbraid them, because they repented not: not because they did not commend him, and speak well of his works, for he sought not his own glory, but their good: all he did was, in order to bring men to repentance of their sins, and faith in himself, that they might be saved.”
Source
1849
A.D.
1774–1849
“Come eating and drinking. Whereas John came living in the wilderness on locusts, wild honey, &c. Yet most part of the Jews neither regarded Christ nor St. John: nay the Pharisees here (ver. 18) say of John, that he is possessed with a devil. — Wisdom is justified by her children. That is, by such as are truly wise; and the sense seems to be, that the divine wisdom and Providence hath been justified, i.e. approved, owned, and declared just and equitable by those that being truly wise, have made good use of the favours and graces offered them at this time of their redemption, when others have remained obstinate in their blindness, and refused to believe in Christ. (Witham) — That is, the multitude of believers by their faith justify the providence and justice of God, against the calumnies of the wicked; for as these believed, what hindered others also from believing? where it appears that Divine Providence omitted nothing of those things, which were necessary to procure and promote the salvation of men. (Menochius)”
Source
1863
A.D.
1796–1863
“Christ admitted the toll-gatherers and other notorious sinners to His familiarity, in order to win them to virtue.”
“The wisdom of God determined that John, by his austerity, and Christ by a more ordinary manner of life, should concur to the same end : namely, to invite sinners to repentance. The truly wise acknowledged and embraced the divine economy, which left unbelievers without excuse.”
Modern · 1953 →

The in-app commentary runs from the Fathers to the early-modern record, then stops — that's where the public-domain sources end, not where the reading does. For the modern reading, follow the sources directly.