Furthermore I count all things to be but loss for the excellent knowledge of Jesus Christ my Lord; for whom I have suffered the loss of all things, and count them but as dung, that I may gain Christ:

“But "those things which he had once accounted gain," and which he enumerates in the preceding verse-"trust in the flesh," the sign of "circumcision," his origin as "an Hebrew of the Hebrews," his descent from "the tribe of Benjamin," his dignity in the honours of the Pharisee -he now reckons to be only "loss" to himself; (in other words, ) it was not the God of the Jews, but their stupid obduracy, which he repudiates. These are also the things "which he counts but dung for the excellency of the knowledge of Christ" (but by no means for the rejection of God the Creator); "whilst he has not his own righteousness, which is of the law, but that which is through Him," i.e. Christ, "the righteousness which is of God.”

“And the Apostle teaches us how to dung it, saying: "I count all things but dung, that I may gain Christ," and he, through evil report and good report, attained to pleasing Christ. For he had read that Abraham, when confessing himself to be but dust and ashes, in his deep humility found favour with God. He had read how Job, sitting among the ashes, regained all that he had lost. He had heard in the utterance of David, how God "raiseth the poor out of the dust, and lifteth the needy out of the dunghill."”

“"Yea verily, and I have counted all things but loss." Why, he means, do I say this of the Law? Is not the world good? Is not the present life good? but if they draw me away from Christ, I count these things loss. Why? "for the excellency of the knowledge of Jesus Christ my Lord." For when the sun hath appeared, it is loss to sit by a candle: so that the loss comes by comparison, by the superiority of the other. You see that Paul makes a comparison from superiority, not from diversity of kind; for that which is superior, is superior to somewhat of like nature to itself. So that he shows the connection of that knowledge by the same means, by which he draws the superiority from the comparison. "For whom I suffered the loss of all things, and do count them dung, that I may gain Christ." It is not yet manifest, whether he speaks of the Law, for it is likely that he applies it to the things of this world. For when he says, "the things which were gain to me, those I have counted loss for Christ; yea verily," he adds, "I count all things loss." Although he said all things, yet it is things present; and if you wish it to be the Law too, not even so is it insulted. For dung comes from wheat, and the strength of the wheat is the dung, I mean, the chaff. But as the dung was useful in its former state, so that we gather it together with the wheat, and had there been no dung, there would have been no wheat, thus too is it with the Law. Seest thou, how everywhere he calls it "loss," not in itself, but for Christ. "Yea verily, and I count all things but loss." Wherefore again? "For the excellency of the knowledge (of Him), for whom I suffered the loss of all things." Again, "wherefore too I count all things to be loss, that I may gain Christ."”

“He set forth examples which they ought to follow; here he shows whose examples they ought to avoid. And concerning this he does three things: first, he sets forth beforehand whom they ought to avoid; second, an example of avoidance through the conduct of the saints, where it says "For we," etc.; third, he leads them to avoid those whom they considered worthy of imitation, where it says "Imitators," etc. Again, the first part is divided into three parts: first he sets forth beforehand the purpose of this teaching; second, the necessity of writing, where it says "the same things to you," etc.; third, the reason for the necessity, where it says "See," etc. The intention of the admonition is to remove the faithful Gentiles from legal observances, to which certain persons were leading them. And therefore he says "O brothers"—namely, through faith—"for the rest," that is, after I have admonished you, as above, "rejoice in the Lord" only, not in legal observances. Habakkuk 3:18: "But I will rejoice in the Lord, and I will exult in God my Jesus," etc. And this, because "the same things" which I said in your presence, it is not tedious for me to write to you in your absence. For words easily pass away, but written things remain. Ecclesiasticus 38:25: "Write wisdom in the time of leisure," etc. Jude 1:3: "Using all diligence to write to you concerning your common salvation, I had need to write to you," etc. Romans 15:15: "I have written to you, brothers, more boldly in part, as it were bringing you back into memory," etc. And the cause of this necessity is that seducers press in; and therefore it is fitting to write the truth more insistently, whence he says "See," that is, observe, etc. And he says three things about these: namely, the irrational savagery of heart; whence he says "dogs." The Gloss: it is the nature of a dog that it barks immediately out of anger, not from reason, but from habit. So also those men. Isaiah 56:11: "Most shameless dogs, they knew not fullness; these shepherds knew not understanding," etc. The last chapter of the Apocalypse: "Outside are the dogs," etc. Second, the sowing of perverse doctrine, where it says "evil workers," because they do not labor faithfully in the vineyard of the Lord, nor do they cast good seed into the field. Matthew 13:28: "An enemy man has done this," etc. 2 Timothy 2:15: "Take care to show yourself approved to God," etc. Third, of dissension, where it says "concision." And he uses this word as a rebuke against them. For they preach circumcision, which cannot stand together with the grace of Christ. Galatians 5:2: "If you are circumcised, Christ will profit you nothing." Whence, playing on the word, he says "concision," as though they have not circumcision but concision. Then when he says "But we," etc., he shows how they are to be avoided by the saints. And first, how by all; second, how by himself, where it says "wherefore," etc. He says therefore: I say that they are the concision, but we are the true circumcision, who in spirit, etc. Now circumcision is twofold, namely bodily and spiritual. Romans 2:28: "For he is not a Jew who is one openly, nor is that circumcision which is openly in the flesh; but he is a Jew who is one in secret, and circumcision is of the heart, in spirit, not in the letter," etc. For circumcision of the flesh is that which is of the excess of the flesh, but circumcision of the spirit is that by which the Holy Spirit cuts away the excessive interior concupiscences. And therefore he says "we are," etc., that is, who inwardly circumcises us to God. Romans 2: "For God is my witness, whom I serve in my spirit in the Gospel of his Son," etc. 1 Corinthians 14:15: "I will sing psalms in spirit, I will sing psalms also with the mind; I will pray in spirit, I will pray also with the mind," etc. Now circumcision was given, as is shown in Romans 4:16, so that it might be shown as a sign of Abraham's faith, namely so that his faith might be shown true, which was faith concerning the future seed. Galatians 3:16: "To Abraham were the promises spoken," etc. Circumcision, therefore, is a sign of Abraham's faith concerning Christ. He therefore is circumcised who is inwardly renewed by the Holy Spirit in Christ, who is the truth of circumcision. Colossians 2:11: "You have been circumcised with a circumcision not made by hand, in the stripping off of the body of the flesh, but in the circumcision of Christ," etc. And "not having confidence in the flesh," that is, in carnal circumcision, because, as is said in John 6:63: "It is the spirit that gives life, but the flesh profits nothing." Now "flesh" is taken in us sometimes for carnal concupiscence, sometimes for care of the flesh, and sometimes for carnal observance. And we ought to circumcise both, and not glory in them. Then when he says "although I," etc., he sets forth his own example, and first he sets forth beforehand his own eminence, which he had in the legal state; second he shows how he despised it, where it says "but what things," etc. The first he sets forth first in general; second he explains part by part, where it says "circumcised," etc. Concerning the first he does two things: first he shows the confidence which he could have had in legal observances, saying: we ought not to have confidence in legal observances, "although I have"—that is, I could have if I wished—because "in whatever anyone is bold—I speak in foolishness—I also am bold," etc., as is said in II, 21. And this even more excellently, because "I more." 2 Corinthians 11:23: "As one less wise, I say, I more," etc. And all this he brings forward so that he might more effectively destroy the legal observances. For many despise what they do not know, or do not have, and this is worth nothing; but it counts when someone has something and despises it, and does not glory in it. Thus, if the Apostle had not had a place in the legal state, it could be said that he came to the state of the Gospel for that reason. And therefore he shows through this his eminence in that state. And first as to lineage; second as to manner of life, where it says "according to the law," etc. As to the first, in three ways: as to the sacrament of his lineage, because "circumcised the eighth day." Genesis 17:10: "That it may be a sign of the covenant between me and you," etc. And he says "the eighth day," because this was the difference between proselytes and those who were of the lineage of Abraham: for the former were circumcised not on the eighth day, but already as adults when they were converted, whereas these, according to the law, were circumcised on the eighth day. Genesis 17:12: "An infant of eight days shall be circumcised among you." Thus therefore he was not as a proselyte, but as a true Israelite. Second, as to the lineage itself, and first as to the people, when he says "of the race of Israel." For from Abraham two peoples descended: one through Isaac, and the other through Ishmael. From the first, two: one through Esau, and the other through Jacob. But the two, namely those from Esau and the Ishmaelites, did not obtain the inheritance, but Jacob alone, who is also Israel. Therefore he says "of the race of Israel." 2 Corinthians 11:22: "Are they Israelites? So am I." Likewise as to the tribe, because in the tribe of Israel there were some from the handmaids, namely from Bilhah and Zilpah; some from the free women, namely Leah and Rachel; and among these certain ones were always in the worship of God, namely Levi, Judah, and Benjamin. The others, in the time of Jeroboam, were turned to idols. And therefore the tribe of Benjamin was privileged, because it was in the faith and love of his wife, and the temple was in it. Deuteronomy 33:12: "Benjamin, most beloved of the Lord, shall dwell confidently in him; as it were in a bridal chamber he shall abide all the day, and he shall rest between his shoulders," etc. Genesis 49:27: "Benjamin a ravenous wolf, in the morning shall eat the prey, and in the evening shall divide the spoil." By which Paul was prefigured, who was at one time against the Church. Third, as to name and language, when he says "Hebrew." Some say that "Hebrew" is said from Abraham: and this Augustine says, but afterward he retracts it. But it is said from Heber, concerning whom Genesis 11:14. But that it is not from Abraham is clear, because even Abraham is called a Hebrew. Genesis 14:13: "It was announced to Abraham the Hebrew." The Gloss on Genesis 11 says that in the time of Heber the lip of all peoples was divided, and that language, which was before, remained in the family of Heber, and in the worship of the one God, and among all the Hebrews. He was also born of Hebrew parents, and therefore he says "of the Hebrews." Then he shows his eminence as to manner of life. And first as to sect, when he says "according to the law, a Pharisee." Among the Jews indeed there were three sects, namely of the Pharisees, the Sadducees, and the Essenes. But the Pharisees approached more closely to the truth, because the Sadducees denied the resurrection, nor did they believe there to be angels, nor spirits. But the Pharisees confess both, as is said in Acts 23:8. And therefore in this the sect of the Pharisees is more commendable. But how he was a Pharisee is stated in Acts 26:5: "Since according to the most certain sect of our religion I lived a Pharisee." Second, as to the zeal which the Jews had, although not according to knowledge, in persecuting Christians, therefore he says "persecuting the Church of God." Galatians 1:23: "He who once persecuted us now preaches the faith which he once assailed." And Acts 26:9: "And I indeed had thought that I ought to do many things contrary to the name of Jesus of Nazareth, which also I did at Jerusalem, and many of the saints I shut up in prisons," etc. 1 Corinthians 15:9: "I am not worthy to be called an apostle, because I persecuted the Church of God." Third, as to the innocence of his manner of life. Therefore he says "according to righteousness," etc. This righteousness consists in exterior things, but the righteousness of faith is of the heart. Acts 15:9: "Purifying their hearts by faith." For, as to exterior righteousness, the Apostle lived innocently. And therefore he says "without complaint," etc. But he does not say "without sin," because complaint is the sin of scandal to one's neighbors in those things which are exterior. Luke 1:6: "Walking in all the commandments and justifications of the Lord without complaint," etc. And therefore it is not contrary to what is said in Ephesians 2:3: "Among whom we also walked," because he did not then have the true righteousness of faith, which makes a man pure, but only that of the law. Then when he says "but what things to me," etc., he shows the contempt of his eminence in legal observances. And first he shows for what reason he despised legal observances in general; second, in particular, where it says "nevertheless," etc. He says therefore: "these things which were," etc., that is, which I reckoned great, namely that I was a Pharisee, etc.—"these I have judged, because of Christ, to be losses to me," that is, I reckon that they are to my detriment. For the legal observances, which in the time of the law were efficacious, through Christ have been made harmful. And therefore he says "losses." And the end of this is Christ. And therefore he says "because of Christ." And he explains, because first, for the sake of knowing Christ; second, for the sake of gaining Christ. As to the first he says, "nevertheless I count all things to be loss"; this is true, if one relied on them. And what I once did, I reckon a loss to me, and this on account of the desire for the right knowledge of Christ my Lord. 1 Corinthians 2:2: "I judged not myself to know anything, except Jesus Christ, and him crucified." And this on account of the surpassing knowledge, etc. For this surpasses all other knowledge. For nothing better can be known than the word of God, in whom are all the treasures of wisdom and knowledge hidden, Colossians 2:3. As to the second he says, "for whom all things," etc. And first he shows that he despised legal observances for the sake of gaining Christ; second he shows that he might gain Christ, where it says "not having," etc. He says therefore, "I have counted all things loss," regarding himself toward them as toward a loss and worthless things, and this "that I may gain Christ," that is, that I may obtain him, and be joined to him through charity.”

“Yea, doubtless, and I count all things but loss,.... Not only the things before mentioned, but anything, and everything else but Christ, or that stood in competition with him, or were short of him; as his natural and acquired parts; the whole compass of learning he had attained to; all that honour, credit, reputation, and popularity he was in for knowledge and devotion; all worldly substance, the comforts of life, and life itself; and all his righteousness since conversion, as well as before; of this no doubt could be made by those who knew him, his principles and his practices: and all this for the excellency of the knowledge of Christ Jesus my Lord: "by the knowledge of Christ" is not meant subjectively the knowledge that is in Christ, or which he has of others, either as God or man; but objectively, that knowledge which believers have of him, who know him not only in his person, as God over all, but as a Saviour and Redeemer, and as theirs; they know him in all his relations, and particularly as their Lord, not by creation only, but by redemption and grace, as the apostle did, putting an emphasis on these words, "my Lord"; thereby expressing his faith of interest in him, his great affection for him, and cheerful subjection to him. And this knowledge is not general, but special, spiritual, and saving; it is a knowledge of approbation of Christ above all others; a fiducial one, which has faith in him joined with it, and is both experimental and, practical, and, at least at times, appropriating; and though imperfect, it is progressive and capable of being increased, and will at last be brought to perfection. It is attained to, not by the light of nature, nor by the help of carnal reason, nor by the law of Moses, but by the Gospel of the grace of God, as a means; and the efficient cause of it is Father, Son, and Spirit; the Father reveals Christ in his saints; the Son gives them an understanding to know him; and the Spirit is a spirit of wisdom and revelation in the knowledge of him; and this knowledge is very excellent: a spiritual knowledge of Christ is more excellent than a general and notional one, or than a knowledge of Christ after the flesh; and the knowledge of Christ under the Gospel dispensation, though the same in nature, is more excellent than that which was under the legal dispensation, by promises, prophecies, and the ceremonial law, in degree, extensiveness, and clearness; but the most excellent knowledge of Christ is that of the saints in heaven; yea, even there is an excellency in what the saints have here on earth, and a superior one to all other knowledge, if the author and original of it is considered: it is not of ourselves, nor by the assistance of men; it is not in the book of nature, nor in the schools of the philosophers; it is not of earth, nor earthly, but it comes from afar, from above, from heaven, from God the Father of lights; it is a free grace gift, a distinguishing one, and is very comprehensive, unspeakable, and unchangeable: and as to the object of it, it is Christ, the chiefest among ten thousands; who made the heavens, earth, and seas, and all that in them are, the sun, moon, and stars, men and beasts, birds and fishes, fossils, minerals, vegetables, and everything in nature; and therefore the knowledge of him must be superior to the knowledge of everything else; and, which adds to its excellency, it makes Christ precious, engages faith and confidence in him, influences the life and conversation, humbles the soul, and creates in it true pleasure and satisfaction; when all other knowledge fills with self-love, pride, and vanity, and increases sorrow; whereas this is not only useful in life, but supports, as under afflictions, so in the views of death and eternity; through it grace is received now, and by it glory hereafter; for it is the beginning, earnest, and pledge of eternal life. Well may the believer count all things but loss for it, as the apostle did; who adds, for further confirmation of what he had asserted, for whom I have suffered the loss of all things; he dropped all confidence in his carnal privileges, and civil, ceremonial, and moral righteousness, for Christ and his righteousness; he parted with all for this pearl of great price; he lost his good name, credit, and reputation among men, and suffered afflictions and persecutions in various shapes; he lost the comforts of life, being often in cold and nakedness, in hunger and thirst, and was ready to suffer the loss of life itself for professing and preaching Christ: and do count them but dung; or dog's meat; see Phi 3:2; what is fit only to be cast to dogs, as the word signifies; and intends every thing that is base, mean, and worthless; as the faeces of men, the dregs and lees of liquor, the falling of fruit, chaff, stubble, the dross of metals, dung, and what not: so he esteemed his carnal descent; his form and sect of religion, and zeal in it; his ceremonial and moral righteousness before and after conversion; and everything of the creature, or what was his own, and but flesh; being of the same opinion with the church of old, who reckoned her righteousnesses, the best, and the whole of them, as "filthy rags". The apostle next expresses his end and views in this, that I may win Christ; not get an interest in him, for this he had already, and he knew he had, and that he should never lose it; and besides, an interest in Christ is not a thing that begins in time, but commenced from all eternity; and is not gotten at all, not by good works, nor repentance, nor faith; for these, if right and genuine, are the fruits and effects of an interest in Christ, but is what is freely given. The apostle's meaning is, either that he might gain or acquire a larger knowledge of Christ; and he cared not what pains he took, what expenses he was at, nor what loss he sustained for what he esteemed the most excellent, and for which he had already suffered the loss of all things; and if he had had more to lose, he could willingly part with it for more of this knowledge; compare Phi 3:10; or his sense is, that he might gain by Christ, or that Christ might be gain to him, as he found him to be, and as he is to every believer; who by parting with all for Christ, gains much by him, as a justifying righteousness, acceptance with God, peace, pardon, life, grace, and glory.”

“I count all things but loss - Not only my Jewish privileges, but all others of every kind; with every thing that men count valuable or gainful, or on which they usually depend for salvation. The excellency of the knowledge of Christ - That superior light, information, and blessedness which come through the Gospel of Jesus Christ; justification through his blood, sanctification by his Spirit, and eternal glory through his merits and intercession. These are the blessings held out to us by the Gospel, of which, and the law, Jesus Christ is the sum and substance. I have suffered the loss of all things - Some translate δι' ον τα παντα εζημιωθην, for whom I have thrown away all things - I have made a voluntary choice of Christ, his cross, his poverty, and his reproach; and for these I have freely sacrificed all I had from the world, and all I could expect from it. And do count them but dung - The word σκυβαλα means the vilest dross or refuse of any thing; the worst excrement. The word shows how utterly insignificant and unavailing, in point of salvation, the apostle esteemed every thing but the Gospel of Jesus. With his best things he freely parted, judging them all loss while put in the place of Christ crucified; and Christ crucified he esteemed infinite gain, when compared with all the rest. Of the utter unavailableness of any thing but Christ to save the soul the Apostle Paul stands as an incontrovertible proof. Could the law have done any thing, the apostle must have known it. He tried, and found it vanity; he tried the Gospel system, and found it the power of God to his salvation. By losing all that the world calls excellent, he gained Christ, and endless salvation through him. Of the glorious influence of the Gospel he is an unimpeachable witness. See the concluding observations on the 9th chapter of the Acts, (Act 9:43 (note)) on the character of St. Paul.”

“Yea doubtless--The oldest manuscripts omit "doubtless" (Greek, "ge"): translate, "nay more." Not only "have I counted" those things just mentioned "loss for Christ's sake, but, moreover, I even DO count ALL things but loss," &c. for the excellency--Greek, "On account of the surpassing excellency (the supereminence above them all) of the knowledge of Christ Jesus." my Lord--believing and loving appropriation of Him (Psa 63:1; Joh 20:28). for whom--"on account of whom." I have suffered the loss--not merely I "counted" them "loss," but have actually lost them. all things--The Greek has the article, referring to the preceding "all things"; "I have suffered the loss of them all." dung--Greek, "refuse (such as excrements, dregs, dross) cast to the dogs," as the derivation expresses. A "loss" is of something having value; but "refuse" is thrown away as not worthy of being any more touched or looked at. win--Translate, to accord with the translation, Phi 3:7, "gain Christ." A man cannot make other things his "gain" or chief confidence, and at the same time "gain Christ." He who loses all things, and even himself, on account of Christ, gains Christ: Christ is His, and He is Christ's (Sol 2:16; Sol 6:3; Luk 9:23-24; Co1 3:23).”