O death, where is thy victory? O death, where is thy sting?

“It is a symbol, too, of the Lord's successful work, He having borne on His head, the princely part of His body, all our iniquities by which we were pierced. For He by His own passion rescued us from offences, and sins, and such like thorns; and having destroyed the devil, deservedly said in triumph, "O Death, where is thy sting?" And we eat grapes from thorns, and figs from thistles; while those to whom He stretched forth His hands—the disobedient and unfruitful people—He lacerates into wounds.”

“Since, therefore, shall then be accomplished the word which was written by the Creator, "O death, where is thy victory"-or thy struggle? "O death, where is thy sting? " -written, I say, by the Creator, for He wrote them by His prophet -to Him will belong the gift, that is, the kingdom, who proclaimed the word which is to be accomplished in the kingdom. And to none other God does he tell us that "thanks" are due, for having enabled us to achieve "the victory" even over death, than to Him from whom he received the very expression of the exulting and triumphant challenge to the mortal foe.”

“Jesus sanctified Baptism by being Himself baptized. If the Son of God was baptized, what godly man is he that despiseth Baptism? But He was baptized not that He might receive remission of sins, for He was sinless; but being sinless, He was baptized, that He might give to them that are baptized a divine and excellent grace. For since the children are partakers of flesh and blood, He also Himself likewise partook of the same, that having been made partakers of His presence in the flesh we might be made partakers also of His Divine grace: thus Jesus was baptized, that thereby we again by our participation might receive both salvation and honour. According to Job, there was in the waters the dragon that draweth up Jordan into his mouth. Since, therefore, it was necessary to break the heads of the dragon in pieces, He went down and bound the strong one in the waters, that we might receive power to tread upon serpents and scorpions. The beast was great and terrible. No fishing-vessel was able to carry one scale of his tail: destruction ran before him, ravaging all that met him. The Life encountered him, that the mouth of Death might henceforth be stopped, and all we that are saved might say, O death, where is thy sting? O grave, where is thy victory? The sting of death is drawn by Baptism.”

“"O death, where is thy sting? O grave, where is thy victory?" Seest thou his noble soul? how even as one who is offering sacrifices for victory, having become inspired and seeing already things future as things past, he leaps and tramples upon death fallen at his feet, and shouts a cry of triumph over its head where it lies, exclaiming mightily and saying, "O death, where is thy sting? O grave, where is thy victory?" It is clean gone, it is perished, it is utterly vanished away, and in vain hast thou done all those former things. For He not only disarmed death and vanquished it, but even destroyed it, and made it quite cease from being.”

“Because human nature was subjected to an enemy as the just desert of sin, man must first be rescued from his power, that he might find him. Then if his life in this flesh is prolonged, he is assisted in the conflict that he may overcome the enemy. And finally the victor will be beatified, that he may reign, and at the very end he will ask: "Death, where is thy devouring?".”

“But when this corruptible shall have put on incorruption, and this mortal shall have put on immortality, then shall be brought to pass the saying that is written, Death is swallowed up in Victory. Where, O Death, is thy sting? As if he said: Death being swallowed up shall disappear, life in us having become more than victorious. Wherefore let us exclaim: Where, O Death, is thy overweening pride? And where, O Hades, thy strength?”

“Here the Apostle sets forth the necessity of the effect of resurrection as it proceeds from its very cause. And concerning this he sets forth two things corresponding to the two things he had set forth in the progression of effects from the cause itself. The first was general to all, namely that the dead will rise incorrupt. And so, first, as to this he says it is necessary that this corruptible put on incorruption. The second was special to the apostles and to the good, namely and we shall be changed, and so, second, as to this he says and this mortal put on immortality. For since corruptible is opposed to incorruptible, and in the state of the present life we are subject to corruption, therefore he says that when we rise again, this corruptible must, etc., by a necessity, namely, of fittingness. And this for three reasons. First, on account of the completion of human nature. For, as Augustine also says, the soul as long as it is separated from the body is imperfect, not having the perfection of its own nature, and therefore it does not exist in as great a beatitude while separated as it will be when united to the body in the resurrection. In order, then, that it may enjoy perfect beatitude, this corruptible, that is, the body, must put on, as an adornment, incorruption, so that further it may in no way be harmed, being mortal. Second, on account of the requirement of divine justice, namely that those who did good or evil in the body may be rewarded or punished also in their very bodies. Third, on account of the conformity of the members to the head; that as Christ rose from the dead through the glory of the Father, so we also might walk in newness of life, Rom. VI, 4. It should be noted, moreover, that he likens incorruption or immortality itself to a garment, when he says put on. For a garment is present to the one clothed and is absent, while the substance of the one clothed remains numerically the same, so that by this he may show that the same bodies numerically will rise, and the same men numerically will exist in the state of incorruption and immortality, in which they now are. Whence by this the error of those who say that bodies will not rise the same in number is excluded. Whence he says pointedly it is necessary that this corruptible, namely the body, since the soul is not corruptible. Also excluded is the error of those who say that glorified bodies will not be the same as these, but heavenly ones, and concerning this manner something similar is found in II Cor. V, 2: for in this we groan, etc.; Is. LII, 1: put on the garments of your glory; Job XL, 5: gird on beauty for yourself, and so forth. But against this it is objected, since it seems impossible that this corruptible should put on incorruption, that is, that bodies should rise the same in number, because it is impossible for things which differ in genus or species to be the same in number; but corruptible and incorruptible differ not only in species but in genus; therefore it is impossible for the bodies of those rising to be incorruptible, and yet remain the same in number. Furthermore, the Philosopher says that it is impossible that those things whose corruptible substance has been moved should be reintegrated the same in number, but the same in species; but the substance of human bodies is corruptible, therefore it is impossible for it to be reintegrated the same in number. I answer. It must be said, as to the first, that each thing follows genus and species from its own nature and not from something extrinsic to its nature, and therefore I say that if the future resurrection of bodies were to come from the principles of the nature of bodies, it would be impossible for bodies to rise the same in number. But I say that the incorruption of rising bodies will be given from another principle than from the nature of the bodies themselves, namely from the glory of the soul, from whose beatitude and incorruption the whole beatitude and incorruption of bodies will be derived. Just as, then, free choice is of the same nature and the same in number, both while it is capable of turning to either side and when it will be made firm in the last end, so also the body will be of the same nature and the same in number, which now is corruptible and then, when it will be made firm through free choice by the glory of the soul, will be incorruptible. To the second it must be said that the reasoning of the Philosopher proceeds against those who held that all things, in these lower realms, are caused from the motion of the heavenly bodies, and that when the same revolutions of the higher bodies have been revolved, the same effects in number would follow, which had once been. Whence they said that Plato would still one day read the same in number at Athens and would have the same schools, and the same hearers whom he had had. And so the Philosopher argues against them, that although the same heaven in number, and the same sun, is in the same revolutions, nevertheless the effects which thence proceed do not follow an identity in number, but in species, and this according to the way of nature. Likewise I say that if bodies were to put on incorruption, and rise according to the way of nature, they would not rise the same in number, but the same in species. But since reintegration and resurrection, as has been said, come about by divine power, we say that bodies will be the same in number, since the individuating principles of this man are nothing other than this soul and this body. In the resurrection, moreover, the same soul in number will return, since it is incorruptible, and this same body in number from the same dust into which it was dissolved, repaired by divine power, so the same man in number will rise. Nor do I press the point regarding intermediate forms, because I do not posit that there is any other substantial form in man except the rational soul, from which the human body has it that it is animated by sensible and vegetable nature and that it is rational. Accidental forms indeed in no way impede the numerical identity which we posit. Consequently, when he says but when this corruptible, etc., he confirms what he had said by an authority. And concerning this he does two things. First he sets forth the authority; second from it he concludes three things, at where is, death, etc. He says therefore first: I said that this corruptible must put on, etc., but when this mortal shall have put on immortality, then, namely in the future — which is against those who say the resurrection has already happened — will come to pass the saying that is written, namely, is swallowed up, etc. This, according to our translation, is not found in any book of the Bible; if, however, it is found in the translation of the Seventy, it is not certain whence it was taken. It can, however, be said that this is taken from Is. XXVI, 19: the dead shall live, etc., and XXV, 8: he will cast down death forever. Hosea XIII, 14, where we have: I will be your death, O death, the Seventy have: death is swallowed up in victory, that is, on account of the victory of Christ. And he puts the past for the future, on account of the certainty of prophecy. I Peter III, 22: swallowing up death, and so forth. Consequently, when he says where is, death, your victory? etc., he concludes three things from the aforesaid authority: the taunting of the saints against death, thanksgivings to God, at but thanks be to God, and his admonition to the Corinthians, at therefore, my brethren, and so forth. Concerning the first he does two things. First he sets forth the taunting, second he expounds it, at but the sting, and so forth. The Apostle, then, speaking of the victory of Christ against death, as though placed in a certain special joy, assumes the person of the men rising again, saying where is, death, your victory? This is not found in any place of sacred Scripture; but whether the Apostle had this from himself, or from elsewhere, is uncertain. If, however, he had taken it from elsewhere, he seems to have taken it from Is. XIV, 4: how has the exactor ceased, the tribute rested, and so forth. He says therefore where is, death, your victory? etc., namely your victory of corruption, that is, the power by which you were laying low the whole human race, by which you were triumphing over all. II Kings XIV, 14: we all die, etc., Job XVIII, v. 14: the king of destruction shall trample over him, and so forth. Where is, death, your sting? What, moreover, the sting is he consequently expounds, saying but the sting, and so forth. Whence he sets forth two things: one by which he expounds what he said; the other by which he excludes an objection, at the power of sin, and so forth. It should be known, moreover, that the sting of death can be said to be either that which stings toward death, or that which death uses or makes; but the literal sense is the sting of death, that is, that which stings toward death, because man through sin is impelled and cast down to death. Rom. V, 23: the wages of sin is death, and so forth. But because someone might object that this sting is removed through the law, therefore the Apostle consequently excludes this, adding but the power, that is, the increase, of sin is the law, as if to say: sin is not removed through the law, rather the law is the power of sin, that is, an increase occasionally, namely not that it induced to sin but insofar as it gave occasion of sin and did not confer grace; from which concupiscence was rather brought nearer to sinning. Rom. V, 20: the law entered in, that offense might abound. Rom. VII, 8: occasion being taken, sin through the commandment, and so forth. There is, however, another sense, but not the literal one, that the sting of death be said to be that which death uses. And thus by death is understood the Devil. Apoc. VI, 8: his name was death. And thus the sting of death is the temptation of the Devil. And thus everything that is said about death is expounded of the Devil, as is held in the Gloss. Or the sting of death, that is, made by death, that is, by carnal concupiscence. James I, 15: when concupiscence has conceived, and so forth. For concupiscence first entices the willing, as in the intemperate; second it drags the resisting, as in the incontinent; afterward it strives, but does not conquer, as in the continent; afterward its striving is weakened, as in the temperate, and lastly it fails altogether, as in the blessed, to whom it is fitting to say: where is, death, your striving or victory? Since, therefore, the sting of death was destroyed not through the law, but through the victory of Christ, therefore thanksgivings are to be rendered to God. And this is what he says but thanks be to God, namely I give, or let us give, who gave us the victory, over death and sin, through Jesus Christ, not through the law. I John V, 4: this is the victory, and so forth. Rom. VII, 24: who shall deliver me, and so forth. The grace of God, and so forth. For what was impossible, and so forth. Consequently, when he says therefore, my brethren, etc., he adds the admonition. For as has been said, the pseudo-apostles were corrupting the Corinthians by denying the resurrection, and therefore, after he has now established the faith of the resurrection, and shown it through examples, he admonishes them to conduct themselves well, lest they be seduced by the pseudo-apostles. And concerning this he does three things. First indeed he confirms them in faith, saying therefore, namely the resurrection now having been shown, my brethren, through faith, by which we are all sons of God, John I, 12: he gave them power, etc., most beloved, through charity by which we ought to love one another, I John IV, 21: this commandment we have from God, etc., be steadfast, namely in the faith of the resurrection, lest you depart from the faith, Eph. IV, 14: let us not be like little children tossed about, etc., and immovable, lest namely you be seduced by others, Col. I, 23: founded in faith, steadfast, and immovable, and so forth. Second he induces them to good works, saying abounding in every good work always, Gal. ult.: while we have time, and so forth. Prov. XV, 5: in abundant justice. Third he strengthens them through hope, saying knowing that your labor, etc., Wis. III, 15: for of good labors the fruit is glorious.”

“O death , where is thy sting? O grave, where is thy victory ? This question received its first answer when Christ rose and brought back from their limbus the souls of the saints, and so rescued this part of His spoil from Hades. Cf. Anselm and Origen (, Horn . xxii. in Evangl), and Augustine ( Sernu 137 de Tempore ). The final answer will be given at the resurrection of all, as the Apostle says here. S. Jerome, writing to Heliodorus about Nepotianus, lately dead, beautifully addresses Death, and exults over it with S. Paul. He says : “ By Hosea He formerly sternly threatened thee : 1 0 death , I will be thy plagues ; O grave , I will be thy destruction.' By His death thou now art dead; by His death we live . Thou hast devoured and been swallowed up, and when thou wast tempted with the bait of the body assumed by Christ, and thoughtest it a prey meet for thy greedy jaws, thou wast straightway pierced within by the barbed hook. We, Thy creation , give thanks to Thee, Christ our Saviour, that when Thou wast slain Thou didst slay this our powerful foe." Similarly, S. Francis, when suffering from the most grievous bodily pains, found no relief but in singing the praises of God and in hearing others singing them ; and, when he was reproved by Elias for devoting his last moments to joy instead of to repentance, he replied that it was not right for him to do otherwise when he knew that in a short time he should be with God. S. Reginald, one of the first companions of S. Dominic, when bidden prepare himself, according to custom, by extreme unction, for his contest with the devil, said : VICTORY OVER DEATH 401 "7 have little fear of that contest ; nay, rather, I joyfully look forward to it; for long ago was I anointed by the mother of mercy : in her I put my utmost confidence, and set out to her with eagerness 7 S. Bernard ( Serm. 26 in Cantica ), speaking of the death of his brother Gerard, who in his last moments had broken out in the words of the Psalmist, “ Praise the Lord of heaven ; praise Him in the height,” wrote as follows : " On thee, my brother, though it was still midnight, day was dawning; the night was as bright as the day . I was summoned to behold that marvel , to see a man rejoicing in death , taunting death: 1 0 death, where is thy sting ? O grave, where is thy victory V There is no longer a sting, but a shout of victory. Man now dies singing, and in singing dies””

“Therefore my beloved brethren,.... This is the conclusion of the whole, and contains the use the apostle makes of the above doctrine, addressing the saints at Corinth in the most tender and affectionate manner; owning the spiritual relation they stood in to him, and expressing the great love he had for them, which filled him with a concern for them, that they might be both sound in principle, and right in practice, and continue so: be ye steadfast, unmoveable; in all the doctrines of the Gospel, and particularly in this of the resurrection of the dead, which he had been labouring throughout the whole chapter: always abounding in the work of the Lord; going on in it, being more and more in the practice of it; either in the work of the ministry, which some of them were in, to which the Lord had called them, and for which he had fitted and qualified them, and in which his glory was greatly concerned, and therefore called his work; or any other work, even all good works, which the Lord commands, requires, calls his people to, and strengthens them to perform: which when they do they may be said to abound, and to be fruitful in every good work: and for their encouragement it is added, forasmuch as ye know that your labour is not in vain in the Lord; the labour of such who were in the ministry was not in vain, but was by the Lord made useful for the conversion of sinners, and the edification of saints, who would be their joy, and crown of rejoicing another day; and which must be no small encouragement to labour; and labour in any kind of good work has here its usefulness: it is profitable unto men, and though not meritorious of eternal life, yet the good works of the saints will follow them; Christ will not forget their work and labour of love which they have shown to his name and people, but will take notice of them as fruits of his own grace, and bestow his rewards upon them, though not in a way of debt, but of grace; which the doctrine of the resurrection assures of, and encourages to hope for; and so must he a friend to the practice of good works, as the contrary doctrine must be an obstruction to them. Next: 1 Corinthians Chapter 16”

“O death, where is thy sting? O grave, where is thy victory? - Που σου, Θανατε, το κεντρον· που σου, ᾁδη, το νικος· These words are generally supposed to be taken from Hos 13:14, where the Hebrew text stands thus: אהי דבריך מות אהי קטבך שאול ehi debareyca maueth; ehikatabca sheol: which we translate, O death! I will be thy plagues; O grave! I will be thy destruction; and which the Septuagint translate very nearly as the apostle, που ἡ δικη σου, Θαντε; που το κεντρον σον, ᾁδη; O death, where is thy revenge, or judicial process? O grave, where is thy sting? And it may be remarked that almost all the MSS., versions, and many of the fathers, interchange the two members of this sentence as they appear in the Septuagint, attributing victory to death; and the sting, to hades or the grave; only the Septuagint, probably by mistake or corruption of copyists, have δικη, dike, revenge or a judicial process, for νικος, nikos, victory: a mistake which the similarity of the words, both in letters and sound, might readily produce. We may observe, also, that the אהי ehi (I will be) of the Hebrew text the Septuagint, and the apostle following them, have translated που, where, as if the word had been written איה where, the two last letters interchanged; but אהי ehi, is rendered where in other places; and our translators, in the 10th verse of this same chapter (Hos 13:10) render אהי מלך ehi malca, "I will be thy king," but have this note in the margin, "Rather, where is thy king? King Hoshea being then in prison." The apostle, therefore, and the Septuagint, are sufficiently vindicated by the use of the word elsewhere: and the best Jewish commentators allow this use of the word. The Targum, Syriac, Arabic, Vulgate, and some MSS. of Kennicott and De Rossi, confirm this reading. Having vindicated the translation, it is necessary to inquire into the meaning of the apostle's expressions. Both Death and Hades are here personified: Death is represented as having a sting, dagger, or goad, by which, like the driver of oxen, he is continually irritating and urging on; (these irritations are the diseases by which men are urged on till they fall into Hades, the empire of Death); to Hades, victory is attributed, having overcome and conquered all human life, and subdued all to its own empire. By the transposition of these two members of the sentence, the victory is given to Death, who has extinguished all human life; and the sting is given to Hades, as in his empire the evil of death is fully displayed by the extinction of all animal life, and the destruction of all human bodies. We have often seen a personification of death in ancient paintings - a skeleton crowned, with a dart in his hand; probably taken from the apostle's description. The Jews represent the angel of death as having a sword, from which deadly drops of gall fall into the mouths of all men. Hades, which we here translate grave, is generally understood to be the place of separate spirits. See the note on Mat 11:23.”

“Quoted from Hos 13:14, substantially; but freely used by the warrant of the Spirit by which Paul wrote. The Hebrew may be translated, "O death, where are thy plagues? Where, O Hades, is thy destruction?" The Septuagint, "Where is thy victory (literally, in a lawsuit), O death? Where is thy sting, O Hades? . . . Sting" answers to the Hebrew "plagues," namely, a poisoned sting causing plagues. Appropriate, as to the old serpent (Gen 3:14-15; Num 21:6). "Victory" answers to the Hebrew "destruction." Compare Isa 25:7, "destroy . . . veil . . . over all nations," namely, victoriously destroy it; and to "in victory" (Co1 15:54), which he triumphantly repeats. The "where" implies their past victorious destroying power and sting, now gone for ever; obtained through Satan's triumph over man in Eden, which enlisted God's law on the side of Satan and death against man (Rom 5:12, Rom 5:17, Rom 5:21). The souls in Hades being freed by the resurrection, death's sting and victory are gone. For "O grave," the oldest manuscripts and versions read, "O death," the second time.”