The interpretation timeline
Psalm 3:7 Douay-Rheims

I will not fear thousands of the people, surrounding me: arise, O Lord; save me, O my God.

A.D. 430 – 1875 9 witnesses

Patristic

before A.D. 750
430
A.D.
Augustine of Hippo Patristic
A.D. 354–430
“"Arise, O Lord, save me, O my God" [Psalm 3:7]. It is not said to God, "Arise," as if asleep or lying down, but it is usual in holy Scripture to attribute to God what He does in us; not indeed universally, but where it can be done suitably; as when He is said to speak, when by His gift Prophets speak, and Apostles, or whatsoever messengers of the truth. Hence that text, "Would you have proof of Christ, who speaks in me?" [2 Corinthians 13:3] For he does not say, of Christ, by whose enlightening or order I speak; but he attributes at once the speaking itself to Him, by whose gift he spoke. "Since You have smitten all who oppose me without a cause." It is not to be pointed as if it were one sentence, "Arise, O Lord, save me, O my God; since You have smitten all who oppose me without a cause." For He did not therefore save Him, because He smote His enemies; but rather He being saved, He smote them. Therefore it belongs to what follows, so that the sense is this; "Since You have smitten all who oppose me without a cause, You have broken the teeth of the sinners;" that is, thereby have You broken the teeth of the sinners, since You have smitten all who oppose me. It is forsooth the punishment of the opposers, whereby their teeth have been broken, that is, the words of sinners rending with their cursing the Son of God, brought to nought, as it were to dust; so that we may understand "teeth" thus, as words of cursing. Of which teeth the Apostle speaks, "If you bite one another, take heed that you be not consumed one of another." [Galatians 5:15] The teeth of sinners can also be taken as the chiefs of sinners; by whose authority each one is cut off from the fellowship of godly livers, and as it were incorporated with evil livers. To these teeth are opposed the Church's teeth, by whose authority believers are cut off from the error of the Gentiles and various opinions, and are translated into that fellowship which is the body of Christ. With these teeth Peter was told to eat the animals when they had been killed, that is, by killing in the Gentiles what they were, and changing them into what he was himself. Of these teeth too of the Church it is said, "Your teeth are as a flock of shorn sheep, coming up from the bath, whereof every one bears twins, and there is not one barren among them." These are they who prescribe rightly, and as they prescribe, live; who do what is written, "Let your works shine before men, that they may bless your Father which is in heaven." [Matthew 5:16] For moved by their authority, they believe God who speaks and works through these men; and separated from the world, to which they were once conformed, they pass over into the members of the Church. And rightly therefore are they, through whom such things are done, called teeth like to shorn sheep; for they have laid aside the burdens of earthly cares, and coming up from the bath, from the washing away of the filth of the world by the Sacrament of Baptism, every one bears twins. For they fulfil the two commandments, of which it is said, "On these two commandments hang all the Law and the Prophets;" [Matthew 22:40] loving God with all their heart, and with all their soul, and with all their mind, and their neighbour as themselves. "There is not one barren among them," for much fruit they render unto God. According to this sense then it is to be thus understood, "You have broken the teeth of the sinners," that is, You have brought the chiefs of the sinners to nought, by smiting all who oppose Me without a cause. For the chiefs according to the Gospel history persecuted Him, while the lower people honoured Him.”
Source

Scholastic

c. 1100 – 1500
1105
A.D.
Rashi Jewish
1040–1105
“have set themselves Heb. שתו, an expression of desolation, gatiront in Old French, to destroy. Others say that שתו is like שמו, they placed, like (Exod. 10:1): “in order that I set up (שתי) my signs.””
1167
A.D.
Ibn Ezra Jewish
1089–1167
“They have set [themselves] against me (אֲשֶׁר... שָׁתוּ עָלָי - Asher... shatu alai): [This means 'they arrayed themselves', from the root שׁית/שׁות - sh-y-t/sh-w-t]. It is similar in sense to [meaning] "they fought" (nilchamu). And some interpreted [the verb shatu as related to the noun] the foundations (הַשָּׁתוֹת - ha-shatot, cf. Psalm 11:3), and the meaning [in context] is like nets (reshatot). Therefore [Scripture adds] the word around (saviv).”
Source
1235
A.D.
Radak Jewish
c. 1160–1235
“I will not be afraid of ten thousands of the people: – for all Israel were with Absalom, except those who were with David in Jerusalem, and had gone out with him, and those who had joined him afterwards. That have set themselves (שתו) against me round about: – They have set their battle in array against me. Or the interpretation of שתו may be “they have fought.” And so “they have taken their stand” (fought, שת שתו) “at the gate” (Is. 22:7); and “He will assail (ישית) thy waves with violence” (job 38:1 1).”
Source
1273
A.D.
Thomas Aquinas Catholic
1225–1274
“The preceding Psalm showed the effort of the adversaries; here, against their effort, he implores divine help. And this Psalm is composed in the manner of a prayer. In this Psalm we can lay down the foundation of the history, and afterward set forth the allegorical sense, and further the moral sense. The historical sense is clear from the title, which is, "when he fled from the face of Absalom his son." As is found in 2 Kings 15, Absalom the son of David, pursuing his father, sought to kill him; David yielded to him, going out from Jerusalem with his men with bare feet. He understood this to befall him on account of the sin of homicide and adultery, just as the prophet Nathan had foretold to him: 2 Kings 12: "The sword shall not depart from your house forever, because you have despised me." But while Absalom was pursuing David, the army of David turned against him; and Absalom, carried by the impetus of his mule, was brought under a branching oak, where, the branches entwining his neck, and there hanging with his head caught, he was slain by Joab, the commander of David's army. When he had died, David, restored to the kingdom, reigned in peace. Against this persecution, therefore, is this Psalm, "Lord, why..." and so forth. Yet by this was prefigured the persecution which Christ suffered from his son Judas, John 13: "Little children, yet a little while I am with you." And again Matthew 9: "Can the children of the bridegroom mourn..." and so forth. From this Judas Christ fled, when, at his departure, with the other apostles he withdrew to the Mount of Olives as the passion drew near. And just as David showed peace to his wicked son, when he charged the people going to war: "Spare the boy Absalom," and when he had been slain, said, "Who will grant me that I might die for you, my son Absalom," etc., so Christ did to Judas the betrayer, as is clear at the banquet and in the kiss; for which reason Absalom is fittingly called "the peace of the father." For "Abba" in Hebrew is interpreted in Latin as "father." "Salon," however, means "peace." And Judas himself betrayed Christ with the utterance of peace. And just as Absalom, so also Judas perished by hanging. When he had died, Christ reigned in peace, because he rose again in glory; and this can be referred to all the tribulations of the Church. It can also be read morally, against the tribulations which one suffers from enemies, whether temporal or spiritual. And therefore the affection of a man imploring is expressed. Concerning this, therefore, he does two things. First he sets forth beforehand the effort of the adversaries, or explains to God his torment. Second he confesses that divine help is present to him, "But you, O Lord," etc. Now he sets forth the persecution, as to the number of those doing harm: "they are multiplied," namely nations, peoples, kings, and princes. And not only these, who are outsiders, but even his son: Psalm 39: "They are multiplied over my head," etc. And as to the motive for doing harm, that it is without cause. Hence: "why": 1 Kings 10 and 26: "What have I done, or what evil is in my hand?" And as to the manifold torment, that they vex in many ways by afflicting. Hence: "they afflict." A tribulus is a pricking plant: Genesis 3: "It shall bring forth to you thorns and thistles." Those, therefore, afflict who prick. But they pricked Christ by buffeting, scourging, spitting upon, mocking him, and threatening him with death. And this is what he says: "many rise up," namely in deeds. For Absalom wished to kill David, as is clear in the counsel of Hushai, 2 Kings 17. Likewise also Judas handed over Christ to death. Again, they afflict with words, by detraction, or by putting forth falsehoods: hence "many say," etc., against that which is said in Psalm 36: "But the salvation of the just is from the Lord." For if the wicked considered this, they would not easily rise up against the just; but because they do not believe this, or because they despise the power of God or the justice of man, therefore they say by mouth and by deed, "There is no salvation for him," etc., that is, in him whom he worships and makes a God for himself. This the persecutors also said of Christ: for if they had hoped that he would rise again, neither would Judas have betrayed him, nor would they have killed him. And the sense is: he will not save him, nor is he the Son of God; hence they said, Matthew 27: "If you are the Son of God, come down from the cross"; and further on, "If he is the King of Israel, let him now come down from the cross, and we will believe him." "But you." This is the second part. Where he shows that help has been prepared for him by God. And concerning this he does two things. First he shows that divine help is present to him specially. Second, that it is present generally to all, at the place, "Salvation is of the Lord." And concerning the first he sets forth three things. First, the divine help. Second, the experience of the help, at "with my voice." Third, the conception of security, at "I will not fear." He says therefore, "But you, O Lord"; as if to say: these rise up to make war, but you take me up to protect me. And this is better according to the letter of Jerome, which says: "my shield is round about me," as if defending me like a shield. Likewise, he not only preserves in life against those wishing to destroy him, but also in glory against those who defame; hence he says "my glory": 2 Corinthians 10: "He who glories, let him glory in the Lord"; Jeremiah 9: "In this let him glory who glories, to know and understand me." And not only do you stand by me against those who defame me, but you also make me prevail against those who oppress me; hence he adds: "lifting up my head": Psalm 26: "And now I have lifted up my head over my enemies." These things can be referred to Christ, who was conceived according to human nature in the incarnation, since "the Word was made flesh," John 1. Isaiah 42: "Behold my servant, I will uphold him; my elect, in whom my soul is well pleased": Psalm 64: "Blessed is he whom you have chosen and taken to yourself." Likewise he was glorious in the resurrection: John 17: "Glorify me, you, Father." Likewise exalted in the ascension: Philippians 2: "Wherefore God also," etc. Then when he says, "with my voice," he shows the experience of the help. And he sets forth three things: namely the prayer, at "with my voice"; second the being heard, at "and he heard me"; third he shows in what he was heard, where he says: "I have slept," etc. Concerning the first he touches on two things which ought to be in prayer: for it ought to be attentive. And therefore he says: "with my voice," namely of the heart, which sounds to God, by which Moses, silent in mouth, cried out to the Lord in his heart: Exodus 14: "The Lord said: Why do you cry to me," etc. By this voice also, crying out, Susanna was heard; Daniel 13: "who, weeping, looked up to heaven, for her heart had confidence in the Lord," etc. 1 Kings 1: "Moreover Hannah spoke in her heart," etc. 1 Corinthians 14: "I will pray with the spirit, I will pray also with the mind." And therefore he says "my." For a voice, when it does not proceed from the heart, is not "mine." Likewise it ought to be right; for then it is right, when it tends where it ought: and therefore he says, "to the Lord," where help is: 2 Chronicles 20: "When we do not know what we ought to do, this only remains to us, that we direct our eyes to you": Psalm 120: "My help is from the Lord." Likewise it ought to be devout: hence he added, "I have cried out"; for prayer is called "clamorous" on account of the greatness of feeling: Psalm 10: "Let my cry come to you," etc. Hebrews 5: "with a strong cry and tears," etc. Then the being heard is set down, when he says: "and he heard me from the mountain," that is, from the sublimity of the divine majesty, which is inaccessible: Psalm 23, "Who shall ascend the mountain of the Lord," that is, to his omnipotence; or from the height of his justice, because it is incomprehensible: Psalm 35: "Your judgments are a great abyss"; or from the holy mountain, that is, from me who was a holy mountain, concerning which Isaiah 2: "And it shall come to pass in the last days that the mountain of the house of the Lord shall be prepared," etc. There follows, "I have slept." Where he shows in what he was heard. "Because I have risen." Now there is a difference between one who is dead and one who is asleep: for the dead does not rise again: Job 14: "Do you think that a dead man shall live again?"; but one asleep does rise: Psalm 40: "Shall not he who sleeps rise again?" Thus, therefore, when the tribulation is so great that a man does not return to his former state, it is called death. But when one afflicted, or tempted, falls into sin and rises again, it is called sleeping. Thus David, as it were, slept, because he was freed from his son and from sin. Now he is said to "sleep" as it were a little; but to be "sunk in slumber" as it were much: hence another text says, "I took sleep," that is, I slept deeply. Thus Christ is said to have slept, because he offered himself willingly to the passion; and because he was sunk in slumber, death followed. Hence from sleeping he passed over into deep sleep. This deep sleep is signified in the deep sleep of Adam. Genesis 2: "The Lord cast a deep sleep upon Adam," etc., because from the side of Christ, dead on the cross, the Church was formed. He says therefore, "and I have risen up," namely by his own power: John 10: "I have power to lay down my life, and I have power to take it up again." And this is because "the Lord has upheld me." Another text has, "sustained." For he had the power of the divinity, that he should rise. Psalm 36: "When the just man falls, he shall not be bruised, because the Lord puts his hand under him." Then when he says, "I will not fear," the confidence of security is set down: as if to say, since I have thus been heard, I will not fear, etc. Below, Psalm 26: "If armies should stand together against me," etc. In which it is signified that the Church of Christ cannot be entirely brought down. To Christ also, after the resurrection, the multitude of the people, which stood about him crucified, could do no harm at all: for "Christ, rising from the dead, dies now no more," Romans 6. And whence he has this confidence, he shows when he says, "Arise," namely, manifest your power by making me rise from death; and this is, "save me," etc. "For you have struck," etc. Above he had said two things: that they afflict him: "Lord, why are they multiplied who afflict me"; and against these he says: "for you have struck"; likewise they defamed him: "there is no salvation for him," etc.; and against these, "the teeth of sinners," that is, you have brought their cursing words to nothing; Job 19: "I was breaking the jaws of the wicked," etc. The text of Jerome has, "you have struck the jaws and the teeth"; as if to say: you have struck so strongly that the teeth were broken. Absalom was the jaw, but the teeth those adhering to him. Hence, Absalom being destroyed, the others were broken. Finally, when he says, "of the Lord," he shows that divine help belongs to the whole people. And first as to preservation from evil; and therefore he says, "salvation is of the Lord." And therefore prayer ought to be directed to God. Second, as to the multiplication of goods; and therefore he says: "upon your people your blessing," that is, upon the people who hope in you and from you, and not in another, is your blessing. The blessing of the Lord always implies the multiplication of goods: Proverbs 10: "The blessing of the Lord makes rich." This Psalm can, however, be read otherwise according to the Gloss, namely that the whole Christ speaks this, that is, the Church and its head, set amid the storms of persecutions. Or this Psalm can be read morally in the person of each and every believer, who is assailed by vices and desires. And according to this, by David is understood any believer whatsoever, by Absalom the vices and carnal concupiscences, as is clear in the Gloss.”

Post-Reformation

c. 1650 – 1900
1771
A.D.
John Gill Reformed
1697–1771
“Arise, O Lord; save me, O my God,.... God sometimes, in the apprehension of his people, seems to be as if he was asleep: when he does not appear to them and for them, and does not exert his power on their behalf, then they call to him to awake and arise; see Psa 44:23; and it may be some respect is had to the words of Moses when the ark set forward, Num 10:35; and it may be observed, that though David enjoyed so much peace and tranquillity of mind, and was in such high spirits as not to be afraid of ten thousands of men, yet he did not neglect the right means of deliverance and safety, prayer to God, who he knew was his God; and he addresses him as such, and uses his covenant interest in him, as an argument with him to arise and save him from his enemies, who was able to do it, and to whom salvation belongs: so Christ, his antitype, prayed to God as his God to save him, and was heard by him in like manner; so the saints call upon God in a day of trouble, cry to him in their distresses, to be delivered out of them; for thou hast smitten all mine enemies upon the cheekbone; to smite anyone upon the cheek is reckoned reproachful, and is casting contempt upon them; see Job 16:10 and the sense is, that God had poured contempt upon his enemies in time past, and had brought them to shame and confusion: hence he puts up the above prayer as a prayer of faith for salvation, founded on past experience of God's goodness; he prayed that his God would arise and save him, and he believed he would because he had hitherto appeared for him, and against his enemies; thou hast broken the teeth of the ungodly; who were like to beasts of prey, whose strength lies in their teeth, whereby they do the mischief they do; and the breaking of their teeth signifies the taking away from them the power of hurting, and refers to the victories which God had given David over the Philistines, Edomites, Syrians, and others; and maybe applied to Christ, and be expressive of sin, Satan, the world, and death, being overcome and abolished by him, and of the victory which the saints have through him over the same enemies.”
Source
1849
A.D.
1774–1849
“Thousands. Septuagint, “myriads.” (Haydock) — If my enemies were still more numerous, I should not fear. (Calmet) — I beseech thee to help me. (Worthington)”
1871
A.D.
1871
“Arise, O Lord--God is figuratively represented as asleep to denote His apparent indifference (Psa 7:6). The use of "cheekbone" and "teeth" represents his enemies as fierce, like wild beasts ready to devour (Psa 27:2), and smiting their cheekbone (Kg1 22:24) denotes violence and insult. thou hast broken--God took his part, utterly depriving the enemy of power to injure.”
Source
1875
A.D.
Keil & Delitzsch Lutheran
1861–1875
“(Heb.: 3:8-9) The bold קוּמה is taken from the mouth of Moses, Num 10:35. God is said to arise when He takes a decisive part in what takes place in this world. Instead of kûmah it is accented kumáh as Milra, in order (since the reading קומה אדני is assumed) that the final ah may be sharply cut off from the guttural initial of the next word, and thus render a clear, exact pronunciation of the latter possible (Hitz., Ew. 228, b). (Note: This is the traditional reason of the accentuation shub h, kûm h, shith h before יהוה: it is intended to prevent the one or other of the two gutturals being swallowed up (יבולעו שׁלא) by too rapid speaking. Hence it is that the same thing takes place even when another word, not the name of God, follows, if it begins with א or the like, and is closely connected with it by meaning and accentuation: e.g., Jdg 4:18 סוּרה twice Milra before ;א Psa 57:9 עוּרה, Milra before ;ה למּה, Milra before ;ה Exo 5:22; נחה Isa 11:2, and חבאת Gen 26:10, Milra before ;ע and the following fact favours it, viz., that for a similar reason Pasek is placed where two י owt would come together, e.g., Gen 21:14 Adonaj jir'eh with the stroke of separation between the two words, cf. Exo 15:18; Pro 8:21. The fact that in Jer 40:5, ישׁבה remains Milel, is accounted for by its being separated from the following אל־גּליה by Pazer; a real exception, however (Michlol 112 b), - and not as Norzi from misapprehension observes, a controverted one, - is שׁבה, Milel before העיר Sa2 15:27, but it is by no means sufficient to oppose the purely orthophonic (not rhythmical) ground of this ultima-accentuation. Even the semi-guttural ר sometimes has a like influence over the tone: rı̂báh rı̂bı̂ Psa 43:1; Psa 119:154.) Beside יהוה we have אלהי evah, with the suff. of appropriating faith. The cry for help is then substantiated by כּי and the retrospective perf. They are not such perff. of prophetically certain hope as in Psa 6:9; Psa 7:7; Psa 9:5., for the logical connection requires an appeal to previous experience in the present passage: they express facts of experience, which are taken from many single events (hence כל) down to the present time. The verb הכּה is construed with a double accusative, as e.g., Iliad xvi. 597 τὸν μὲν ἄρα Γλαῦκος στῆθος μέσον οὔτασε δουρί. The idea of contempt (Job 16:10) is combined with that of rendering harmless in this "smiting upon the cheek." What is meant is a striking in of the jaw-bone and therewith a breaking of the teeth in pieces (שׁבּר). David means, an ignominious end has always come upon the ungodly who rose up against him and against God's order in general, as their punishment. The enemies are conceived of as monsters given to biting, and the picture of their fate is fashioned according to this conception. Jahve has the power and the will to defend His Anointed against their hostility: הישׁוּעה לה penes Jovam est salus. ישׁוּעה (from ישׁע, Arab. wasi‛a, amplum esse) signifies breadth as applied to perfect freedom of motion, removal of all straitness and oppression, prosperity without exposure to danger and unbeclouded. In the ל of possession lies the idea of the exclusiveness of the possession and of perfect freedom of disposal. At Jahve's free disposal stands הישׁוּעה, salvation, in all its fulness (just so in Jon 2:10, Rev 7:10). In connection therewith David first of all thinks of his own need of deliverance. But as a true king he cannot before God think of himself, without connecting himself with his people. Therefore he closes with the intercessory inference: ברכתך על־עמּך Upon Thy people by Thy blessing! We may supply תּהי or תּבא. Instead of cursing his faithless people he implores a blessing upon those who have been piteously led astray and deceived. This "upon Thy people be Thy blessing!" has its counterpart in the "Father forgive them" of the other David, whom His people crucified. The one concluding word of the Psalm - observes Ewald - casts a bright light into the very depths of his noble soul.”
Source
Modern · 1953 →

The in-app commentary runs from the Fathers to the early-modern record, then stops — that's where the public-domain sources end, not where the reading does. For the modern reading, follow the sources directly.