Give ear, O Lord, to my words, understand my cry.

“From the start God examines all the words that you speak, whether they are shameful, blasphemous or lying words; whether malicious, harmful or deceitful; or whether they are words of degradation, which through their deceit are able to overwhelm the one whom the lie injures. "You have loved words of destruction, a deceitful tongue." … "Every careless word that people speak will return to them judgment." How much more when you speak hurtful words do they become a hindrance and destruction to your spirit! God judges your cry: whether you have cried out against anyone unjustly, whether you have trumpeted unjust anger with your cry or whether you, overcome with such wrath, have called for the striking down of the innocent, like those who stoned Stephen: "Shouting with a loud voice, they covered their ears and in one spirit united against him they rushed him." And their shout became a vehicle of murder. God, therefore, tests your words.… Therefore, since God will measure our words, let us give to him spiritual songs and canticles, hymns and psalms, becoming a sweet smell not by running to bars but by hastening to the church; not sunk in our drunkenness but adorned with sobriety; not dancing and being wanton like the Jews but glorifying the way of life of the apostles.… No one may walk into the royal dwelling leaping about; no one may stand before the king drunk. If such caution is followed on earth, how much more caution is there for the heavenly state and the kingdom that exists there? Let us live lives worthy of that kingdom, rejoicing and happy in the grace and mercy of our Lord Jesus Christ to whom there is glory and power from now to infinite ages of ages.”

“"Attend Thou to the voice of my supplication;" that is, to that voice, which he maketh request that God would understand: of which what the nature is, he hath already intimated, when he said, "Understand my cry. Attend Thou to the voice of my supplication, my King, and my God" (ver. 2). Although both the Son is God, and the Father God, and the Father and the Son together One God; and if asked of the Holy Ghost, we must give no other answer than that He is God; and when the Father, and the Son, and the Holy Ghost are mentioned together, we must understand nothing else, than One God; nevertheless Scripture is wont to give the appellation of King to the Son. According then to that which is said, "By Me man cometh to the Father," rightly is it first, "my King;" and then, "my God." And yet has not the Psalmist said, Attend Ye; but, "Attend Thou." For the Catholic faith preaches not two or three Gods, but the Very Trinity, One God. Not that the same Trinity can be together, now the Father, now the Son, now the Holy Ghost, as Sabellius believed: but that the Father must be none but the Father, and the Son none but the Son, and the Holy Ghost none but the Holy Ghost, and this Trinity but One God. Hence when the Apostle had said, "Of whom are all things, by whom are all things, in whom are all things," he is believed to have conveyed an intimation of the Very Trinity; and yet he did not add, to Them be glory; but, "to Him be glory."”

“Give ear to my words, O Lord when I have strength to ask before You and, when I have no strength to pray before You and the worry is confined to my heart...consider my meditation Heb. בינה. Consider the meditation of my heart. So it is explained in Midrash [Psalms 5:6]: In every [instance of] בינה in Scripture, the accent is under the “nun,” except this one and its fellow (in Job 34: 16): “And if you wish, understand (בִּנָה), hearken to this,” which is not a noun but an expression of “understand,” like (Prov. 23:1): “you should understand well (בין תבין) who is in front of you.” Therefore, the accent is under the “beth.””

“Give ear (ha'azinah) to my words: [The verb ha'azinah is] from the same root/sector (mi-gizrat) as oznayim (ears). [It means] "Incline Your ear." Consider (binah): [This is] the imperative form (lashon tzivui). Similar to [the imperative] "Simah na" ("Place, please" - cf. Job 17:3). My utterance (hagigi): [This noun is from a] doubled Ayin [root, ה-ג-ג / H-G-G], for it is from [the root] H-G-H. [It is formed] like [the noun] z'nuneha (her harlotry - from ז-נ-ה). And [the Psalmist] said "Consider" (Binah) to Ad-nai in the manner of a human being [using anthropomorphic language]. This is similar to [the request in (Psalm 139:23)] "And know my heart," and also [to] "Give ear" (Ha'azinah). And the meaning/reason is so that it will become clear to all that there is no doubt He knows everything, and He has no need for [physical] ears – in the manner of (Psalm 94:9): "He who plants the ear, shall He not hear?" [Regarding the word] Attend (Hakshivah) [in the next verse, v. 3]: This root (gizrah - ק-שׁ-ב / Q-Sh-B) is [typically] connected with [the preposition] Lamed [ל־, meaning "to"]. Therefore, it is not correct usage (lo nakhon) to say [a phrase like] "Mi yakshiveni?" ("Who will listen me?" [without the Lamed indicating to whom one listens]). And the meaning of My King [in v. 3] is: I have no [other] king to whom I cry for help (eshava elav), only You alone.”

“Give ear to my words, O Lord, Consider my meditation: – Give ear to what I utter with my mouth and consider what I meditate in my heart. Therefore he uses the word consider with meditation, and give ear to with my words. He uses (the term) הגיגי (“my meditation”), which is derived from הגה by doubling the second radical, just as (in the verse) “for the lightning (חזיז) of the thunder” (Job 38:25), (where חזיז is derived) from חזה.”

“Above, the Psalmist set forth a prayer against those who persecute him openly; here he prays against the deceitful, lest he be deceived. And concerning this he does two things. First he sets down a petition against the deceitful, lest he be deceived. Second, that his fall may be repaired, where he says, "O Lord, rebuke me not in thy indignation," etc. This Psalm has in its title something new, which is this: "Unto the end, for her that obtaineth the inheritance." Here a figure and a mystery are touched upon. The figure indeed can be understood in two ways. First, as the Gloss expounds it, and as is found in the history of Genesis 21, that Sara, seeing Ismael playing with Isaac her son, was troubled, and said to Abraham: "Cast out this bondwoman and her son: for the son of the bondwoman shall not be heir with my son Isaac." Sara understood that playing to be a persecution against Isaac; but Abraham took it hard, what Sara had said about his son Ismael; but God said to him: "Let it not seem grievous to thee for the boy, and for thy bondwoman: in all that Sara hath said to thee, hearken to her voice: for in Isaac shall thy seed be called," etc.: as if to say: Isaac shall be thy heir, not Ismael. Whence below, in Genesis 25, it is said: "Abraham gave all his possessions to Isaac; and to the children of the concubines he gave gifts," etc. This Psalm, then, can be referred to this: that the people of the Jews, according to the figure, obtained the promised inheritance of Abraham, whose head was David, and king. But according to the mystery, the Christian people obtained it: Galatians 4: "Now we, brethren, as Isaac was, are the children of promise." Therefore this Psalm tends unto the end, that is, unto Christ, whom it praises for her, namely for the Church, which obtains the inheritance, the synagogue being reproved. In another way, according to the letter of Jerome, the title is: "To the victor, a song of David for the heirs": and thus it can be understood that this Psalm was made for a victory which David had, according to the letter. And it must be known that David, fleeing, lost his inheritance through Absalom, as is found in 2 Kings 16. Whence, just as the preceding Psalm was for deliverance and victory against Absalom, so he made this one for the recovery of his inheritance: because when David had returned to Jerusalem, still certain others rose up wickedly against him. Whence in 2 Kings 20, David commanded Amasa that within three days he should assemble all the men of Judah, that he might pursue Seba the son of Bochri: "for he is likely to do us more harm than did Absalom." For Seba had passed through all the tribes of Israel as far as Abela, and all the chosen men had gathered to him: when he was beheaded, David reigned over all Israel. In this Psalm, then, according to the letter, three things are considered. First he asks to be heard. Second he shows his confidence of being heard, where he says, "in the morning thou shalt hear." Third he sets forth his petition, where he says, "O Lord, lead me." Concerning the first he does two things. First he asks to be heard. Second he signifies the reason for being heard, where he says, "my king." It must be noted that whoever wishes to ask something of someone proceeds thus. First he desires what he wishes to ask. Second he meditates the words to be proposed. Third he proposes them to the one who is to hear. And conversely for the hearer. First he perceives the words by hearing. Second by understanding he grasps the sense of the words. Third he is inclined to fulfill the desire of the petitioner. David, then, speaks to God according to this likeness. And first he asks the first thing, namely that He hear his words with exterior hearing, when he says, "Give ear, O Lord, to my words." Second he asks for the sense, namely the understanding of the words, when he says, "understand my cry," not the exterior but the interior affection: Psalm 17: my cry in his sight; Jerome: "understand my murmuring," which I have thought to propose: and this agrees with that translation which says "my meditation." Third he asks for the third thing, namely to be heard: "attend to the voice of my prayer," that is, may you be willing to hear my prayer: Psalm 69: "O God, attend unto my help." But does God do these things separately — hear, attend, hearken? It must be said that he speaks metaphorically: namely that He may approve all these things, the exterior words, the interior meditation, and what is proposed. Second he sets down the reason for being heard, when he says, "my king." And this is the beginning of the verse according to the Greek. A threefold reason for being heard is set down, namely on the part of God. Of these one is "my king." For it belongs to a king to govern. Since, then, this pertains to God, it pertains to Him to provide for necessities: Jeremiah 10: "who shall not fear thee, O king of nations?" Another reason is that He is "God": for God is the end of our wills and their preserver: Psalm 27: "in God my heart hath confided, and I have been helped," etc. And therefore he says "my God": Isaiah 8: "should not the people seek a vision of their God, for the living and for the dead," etc. The third reason is taken on the part of him who prays, when he says: "for I will pray to thee, O Lord"; as if to say: it is fitting, because thou hast promised to hear those who pray. Matthew 7: "every one that asketh, receiveth; and he that seeketh, findeth; and to him that knocketh it shall be opened." Nor is it a contradiction that Jerome says "I entreat," while here it says "I will pray": because this designates the continuation of prayer without ceasing: as if to say: thus will I pray, yet I always entreat: Luke 18: "we ought always to pray, and not to faint." This is the second part of the Psalm. Here he first shows that he has confidence of being heard. Second, the reason for that confidence, where he says "in the morning I will stand before thee," etc. He says, then: "in the morning thou shalt hear my voice": according to the letter, that is, quickly, as if to say seasonably. For this we ought to hope of God, that He will hear quickly: Isaiah 30: "at the voice of thy cry, as soon as he shall hear, he will answer thee." The same, near the end: "while they are yet speaking, I will hear." The reason for his confidence is set down when he says, "in the morning I will stand before thee," etc. Note that "morning" is spoken of in four ways: namely of the natural day: Genesis 1: "the evening and morning were one day." Likewise of human life; and thus youth is called morning: Psalm 89: "in the morning may it flourish and pass away." Likewise of the day of grace, in the first conversion of man to God, because then he begins to have the light of grace: Psalm 89: "we are filled in the morning with thy mercy." Likewise of eternity: Psalm 29: "in the evening," namely in the present life, "weeping shall have place, and in the morning," namely of eternity, "joy." A twofold reason, then, is assigned for this confidence. First, because "in the morning" he stands, that is, he adheres to God, and prepares himself for God; whence Jerome has "I will prepare myself": Ecclesiasticus 18: "before prayer prepare thy soul, and be not as a man that tempteth God." "In the morning," then, of the day, that is, in the mornings, "I will stand before thee," that is, I will attend to thee. And this, because then a man is free from cares, and has a heart more free to think of God: Psalm 62: "in the mornings, O Lord, I will meditate on thee": Isaiah 26: "yea, with my spirit within me in the morning early will I watch to thee, and thou shalt hear my voice," etc. Because He hears the devout. "In the morning," namely of grace, the darkness of guilt being driven away, "I will stand before thee, and will contemplate," as the letter of Jerome has it. 2 Kings 23: "as the light of the morning, when the sun riseth, shineth in the east without clouds," etc. "Thou shalt hear my voice," namely by freeing from guilt and punishment. Or "in the morning," namely on the day of eternity: Job 38: "where wast thou when the morning stars praised me together," etc. And then man is heard totally. Or "in the morning," that is, from youth: "I will stand before thee": Lamentations 3: "it is good for a man, when he hath borne the yoke of the Lord from his youth." Ecclesiastes, at the end: "remember thy Creator in the days of thy youth," etc. "Thou shalt hear my voice," because Proverbs 8: "I love them that love me: and they that in the morning early watch for me, shall find me." The second reason for his confidence is that he sees; whence he says, "and I will see": and he expounds this, first how he stands, when he says: "but I, in the multitude." First he says what he sees: namely who are those who are hindered from being heard, and what sort of hindrances these are: and these are the wicked; whence he says "I will see," namely because God, etc. Here two things must be noted. First, that the wicked are excluded from these things. Second, that they are led into the evils of punishment, where he says, "thou hast hated all," etc. Concerning the first he speaks of God as of some man who loves some and hates others. Here a threefold degree can be found: because to one, the sin of the sinner is pleasing; to another, the person of the sinner is pleasing; to another, neither, yet nonetheless he willingly and without indignation looks upon him. But this is not the case in God: because sin is not pleasing to God, nor does He regard familiarity with the sinner. Likewise He disdains to look upon him: and therefore, as to the first, he says, "I will see, for thou art not a God that willest iniquity," that is, sin is not pleasing to thee. As to the second he says: "neither shall the wicked dwell near thee," that is, thou dost not hold him in thy familiarity: Psalm 100: "shall not dwell in the midst of my house," etc. Likewise in the same, 25 (5): "I have hated the assembly of the malignant." As to the third he says, "nor shall the unjust," that is, sinners, "abide before thy eyes," namely of approval: Habakkuk 1: "thy eyes are clean, and thou canst not look on iniquity." Here he shows how they are brought to punishment: and he sets down a threefold order. For there is a threefold degree in the manner in which one hates another. First, one holds him in hatred, willing him evil in one's heart. Second, one carries this out by inflicting punishment. Third, if one has punished, one nonetheless reconciles him to oneself afterward. But God first hates; whence he says, "thou hast hated all," etc. Wisdom 14: "for God hateth alike the ungodly and his ungodliness." But on the contrary, Wisdom 11 (26): "thou lovest all things that are," etc. I answer that God does not hate what He has made, but what He has not made, namely sin. But if we persist obstinately, He hates the sinner insofar as He does not recall him, and orders him through punishments. Second, He inflicts punishment; and therefore he says: "thou wilt destroy all that speak a lie": Wisdom 1: "the mouth that belieth killeth the soul." Note that lying is threefold: namely pernicious, which is done to the harm of another, whether in a spiritual or a temporal matter, as in doctrine; and this is most grave. Jesting, which is spoken for delight. Officious, by which one speaks in order to be of profit, whether temporally or spiritually. And according to Augustine, "no officious lie is without sin": because if you lie in order to free someone, this is not good: for the Apostle says, Romans 3: "evil is not to be done that good may come of it." Moreover, any evil could be done for the sake of some good; nonetheless an officious lie can sometimes be venial. But a jesting lie is always venial. A pernicious lie, however, is always mortal: and it is this that is understood here. Third, God hates in the sense of one inflicting punishments who is not reconciled; whence he adds: "the Lord will abhor the bloody and deceitful man." We abhor those things which we cannot bear even to know of. Men of blood are called those whose disposition is toward the shedding of blood: Proverbs 1: "their feet run to evil, and they make haste to shed blood": 2 Kings 16: "come out, thou man of blood." The deceitful man is one who speaks in guile. But it must be noted that the Psalmist proceeds in an orderly manner: because first a man simply works evil by thinking it; and these God hates. But when they add malice by carrying it out, they provoke God to punish. But when they persist, then God abhors them: Proverbs 17 (16:5): "the life of the wicked is an abomination to God," etc. Consequently, when he says, "but I," he shows how he stands before the Lord: and concerning this he does two things. First he shows how he approaches God. Second, what prayer he offers, where he says, "I will worship." Someone might say to him: you say that "the wicked shall not dwell near thee." But art thou not thyself a sinner? How then wilt thou stand? And therefore he says, "not according to my merits, but in the multitude of thy mercy will I come into thy house," that is, I will draw near to thee, "into thy house." Or, according to the letter, this is called the temple, or the congregation of the faithful: 1 Timothy 3: "how thou oughtest to behave thyself in the house of God, which is the church of God." Daniel 9: "for it is not for our justifications that we present our prayers before thy face," etc. But thou, being a sinner, that is, a man of blood, how dost thou draw near or worship? Certainly, "in thy fear": Ecclesiasticus 1: "he that is without fear cannot be justified"; therefore he says, "in thy fear," namely with reverence. Above he asked that his prayer be heard; here he sets it forth. And first he prays for himself. Second, for others. Concerning the first he does two things. First he sets forth the prayer. Second he sets down the reason for it, where he says, "because there is no." Concerning the first he asks two things; namely to be led and to be directed; and this because man in the world is as on a road: Isaiah 30: "this is the way, walk ye in it." Now those who go along a road need two things: because if the road is not safe, they need a guide; or one to direct them, if it is doubtful. In the world there are enemies on every side: Psalm 141: "in this way wherein I walked, they have hidden a snare for me." Likewise the way is unknown: Job 3: "to a man whose way is hidden," etc. And therefore he first asks, "O Lord, lead me in thy justice," according to thy justice, or that I may walk in thy justice: and this, "because of my enemies": Psalm 142: "thy good spirit shall lead me into the right land: for thy name's sake, O Lord, thou wilt quicken me in thy equity." "Make my way straight in thy sight." Another translation has, "make thy way straight in my sight": the first agrees with Jerome, the second with the Greek; but nonetheless the sense is the same: as if to say: Lord, I am on a hidden way: Proverbs 14: "there is a way which seemeth to a man right: but the ends thereof lead to death"; and therefore, "direct me in thy sight," that is, according to thy providence, because nothing is hidden from thee. Or "in thy sight," that I may always please thee. Or "thy way in my sight," namely that it may always be in my heart, that I may always be able to follow thee. Then, when he adds, "for," he assigns the reason for his petition, and describes his enemies, and the danger that threatens. First from a lack of good. Second from an abundance of evil, where he says, "for their heart," etc. There is indeed a lack, because if they kept peace, I could be at peace with them and go about securely. But "there is no truth in their mouth"; because they have one thing in their mouth and another in their heart: Hosea 4: "there is no truth"; and therefore I cannot go about securely. Likewise there is an abundance of evil. And first as to their scheming, when he says: "their heart is vain," that is, they meditate vain things, things which they cannot attain, namely to deceive the poor who are guarded by thee: Ecclesiasticus 2 (10): "many are the snares of the deceitful." Second, from their greed: because, "their throat is an open sepulchre." The throat serves for taste and for speech. It can be read in one way, so that it is expounded according as it is ordered to speech; as if to say: their throat is an open sepulchre: for as a sepulchre is a place of the dead, and a stench issues from it, so their speeches put others to death, whether spiritually or bodily: 1 Corinthians 15: "evil communications corrupt good manners." Likewise the utterances of such men are foul, because they speak vile things: Ecclesiasticus 2 (13:26): "the bowels of fools belch forth foulness." In another way it may be expounded as to eating and greed: and this we can take either according to the letter; and thus they are an open sepulchre, because they are voracious. And for this reason, that they may fill their voracity, they flatter, and act unjustly. Or figuratively: and just as a sepulchre, of itself, is prepared to receive the dead, so these men are always prepared to deceive: Jeremiah 5: "their quiver is as an open sepulchre." Third, as to their oppression of others, "with their tongues," etc.: as if to say: by smooth words they lead to death: Romans 16: "by sweet speeches and flatteringly seduce the hearts of the innocent": Jeremiah 9: "their tongue is a piercing arrow," etc. This can be the prayer of the just man and of the Church. Consequently, when he says, "judge," he prays for others. And first against the wicked. Second for the good, where he says, "and let... rejoice." Concerning the first he does three things. First he asks for their judgment. Second he determines the manner of the judgment, where he says, "let them fall," etc. Third he assigns the cause of the judgment, where he says, "because they have provoked thee." He says, then, "judge them," since they are evil. But it must be noted that judgment is twofold: namely of discernment, by which even the good are judged: Psalm 42: "judge me, O God, and distinguish my cause," etc. Second, of condemnation: John 3: "he that believeth not is already judged." Here he speaks of the judgment of condemnation, by which the wicked will be judged at the last judgment: whence Jerome has, "condemn them, O God." But on the contrary: Matthew 5: "pray for them that persecute and calumniate you." I answer. It must be said that the prophets, in their prophecy, did not speak by their own will: 2 Peter 1: "for prophecy came not at any time by the will of man, but by the Holy Spirit, etc.." And therefore what they uttered, they said according to the understanding of divine justice: and therefore these were rather predictions of future things than prayers of their own: whence "judge," that is, I know that thou wilt judge. The manner of justice is set down as twofold. First, that they may fail of their intent. Second, that they may be removed from their place. By the first, the evils which they intend are impeded: and therefore he says, "let them fall by their own counsels," that is, their plans: Job 5: "who catcheth the wise in their craftiness," etc. Or "let them fall," that is, let them be punished for their own thoughts: Romans 2: "of their thoughts accusing," etc. But by the second they are expelled from the company of the good; whence it follows: "according to the multitude of," etc. This will be then, when, Matthew 25, it will be said: "depart, ye cursed," etc. Job 18: "he shall drive him out of light into darkness," etc. And he says, "according to the multitude of their wickednesses," because according to these will be the manner of condemnation: Deuteronomy 25: "according to the measure of the sin shall be also the measure of the stripes." The cause is set down: "because they have provoked thee," that is, have provoked thee to anger. This shows in God not anger, but the will to punish. Another letter has, "have embittered thee," who art sweet, by sinning obstinately against thee. Sinners first sin, afterward they aggravate their sin by obstinacy, and then God does not spare, but is provoked, that is, is moved to vengeance: Romans 2: "knowest thou not that the benignity of God leadeth thee to penance? But according to thy hardness..." Deuteronomy 32: "they have provoked me with that which was no god," etc. Consequently, when he says, "and let... rejoice," he sets down his petition. And first he sets it down. Second he adds an exposition, "for ever." Concerning the first he does two things. For first he sets down what he asks, namely joy; whence he says "let them rejoice": for this is the end of all goods. Psalm 67: "let the just feast, and rejoice before God: and be delighted with gladness." Second, for whom he asks it, namely for those who hope; whence, "all they that hope in thee." Consequently, when he says, "they shall rejoice for ever," he first expounds, and says, "let them rejoice." Second, when he says, "they shall hope," where it says, "for thou hast blessed the just." For the joy of the saints in their homeland is everlasting: and therefore he says, "for ever"; and secure; whence he adds, "and thou shalt dwell in them"; full, on account of which he adds, "and they shall glory," etc. It is indeed everlasting, not temporal: Isaiah 51: "everlasting joy shall be upon their heads," etc. Secure, without disturbance: Isaiah 32: "my people shall sit in the beauty of peace, and in the tabernacles of confidence"; and therefore he says, "and thou shalt dwell in them," as a protector: whence Jerome has, "and thou shalt protect them": Apocalypse 21: "behold the tabernacle of God with men, and he will dwell with them." It is also full: and this is clear from four things. First from the glory thence conceived; whence, "they shall glory," because no one glories in a thing unless he possesses it excellently. But the saints possess God most excellently; therefore he says, "they shall glory." Second from the matter: because they glory in a thing most full, and in every good: John 16: "hitherto you have not asked any thing in my name: ask, and you shall receive; that your joy may be full": John 15: "that my joy may be in you," etc. And therefore he says, "in thee." Third from companionship: because a man alone cannot well rejoice in something, but rather when he has friends who share with him in that good: and therefore he says, "all." Psalm 86: "as it were of all rejoicing, is thy dwelling in thee." Fourth from perfection, "who love thee": for this is proper to friends, to rejoice in the good of a friend, nor does a man easily let go of what he loves. Consequently, when he says, "for," he shows why they hope. Because first, on account of the gift of grace. Second, from the mercy of predestination, etc. From the gift of grace indeed; whence he says, "for thou hast blessed the just," namely by giving him special grace: Ephesians 1: "who hath blessed us with all spiritual blessing in heavenly places." And the mercy of predestination: Ephesians 1: "we are predestinated according to the purpose of his will, who worketh all things in all": and this is what he says, "with the shield of thy good will," namely with the eternal will of his mercy, which from eternity has disposed to save: Ephesians 1: "he chose us before the foundation of the world, that we should be holy and unspotted." And when he says "as with a shield," he intimates that the very will of God is good, like a shield against all evils: 2 Kings 23 (22:3): "the Lord is my shield and my strength," etc. Or this is here as a shield protecting, but in our homeland as a shield crowning. For it was the ancient custom of the Romans to use round shields, and in these they had their hope of victory; and when they triumphed, they used that same shield as a crown. And hence the saints are painted with a round shield upon the head: because, having obtained the triumph over their enemies, they bear a round shield after the manner of the Romans upon the head in place of a crown. He says, then: "with the shield of thy good will thou hast crowned us"; as if to say: in place of the shield of our crowning we have thy good will, which here defends us, and there crowns us. On Psalm 6...”

“Hearken unto the voice of my cry,.... Which seems to intend more than groans or words, even a loud outcry, as of a person in great distress; such as the strong crying of Christ, in the days of his flesh, when on the cross, forsaken by God, deserted by his friends, and surrounded by his enemies, Heb 5:7; and such, in some measure, was the case of David. The arguments used by him, that the Lord would hearken to him, are as follow: and the first is taken from his interest in the Lord, and his relation to him, my King and my God; the Lord was David's King in a civil sense; though David was a king over others, yet the Lord, who is the King of kings, was King over him, and he owned him to be so; he was set upon the throne by him, had his kingdom from him, and was accountable to him: and he was his King in a natural sense, the kingdom of nature and providence belonging to him, as he was his Creator, preserver, protector, and defender; and in a spiritual sense, he being delivered from the dominion of other lords, sin, Satan, and the world, and brought to a subjection to him by his Spirit and grace; and so to own him as his King and Lawgiver, as well as his Saviour. And he was his God; not in a general way, as he is the God of the spirits of all flesh living; nor merely in the peculiar way in which he was the God of the people of Israel; but in a most special manner, as being his covenant God and Father in Christ. He was his God, not only as the God of nature and providence, but as the God of all grace; who had distinguished him by special and spiritual blessings and favours; and whom David loved, believed in, and worshipped as his God. And this his interest in him, and relation to him, he uses with great pertinence and propriety, as an argument that he might be heard by him; since the Lord was his King, and he his subject; the Lord was his God, and he one of his people; the Lord was his father, and he a child of his; and therefore entreats and hopes to be heard; see Isa 63:15. His next argument is taken from his resolution to pray to him, and to continue to do so: for unto thee will I pray; and only to thee: not to the gods of the Heathen, to idols, the works of men's hands, who can neither hear nor save: and to thee always; suggesting, that he would never leave off praying till he was heard; he would give him no rest, day nor night, until he received an answer.”

“Cry. Hebrew, “meditation.” (Menochius) — The cry of the heart, (St. Chrysostom) and “the groans,” which the spirit forms within us, Romans viii. 26. God cannot reject such prayers. If he seems inattentive, it is because we ask amiss, James iv. 3. (Calmet) — He attends to the prayers of the Church, and of every faithful soul, (Worthington) and even exhorts sinners to come to him, that they may emerge from the abyss. (Haydock)”