The interpretation timeline
1 Corinthians 10:4 Douay-Rheims

And all drank the same spiritual drink; (and they drank of the spiritual rock that followed them, and the rock was Christ.)

A.D. 108 – 1871 17 witnesses 21 excerpts

Patristic

before A.D. 750
108
A.D.
c. A.D. 50–107
“The priests indeed, and the ministers of the word, are good; but the High Priest is better, to whom the holy of holies has been committed, and who alone has been entrusted with the secrets of God. The ministering powers of God are good. The Comforter is holy, and the Word is holy, the Son of the Father, by whom He made all things, and exercises a providence over them all. This is the Way which leads to the Father, the Rock, the Defence, the Key, the Shepherd, the Sacrifice, the Door of knowledge, through which have entered Abraham, and Isaac, and Jacob, Moses and all the company of the prophets, and these pillars of the world, the apostles, and the spouse of Christ, on whose account He poured out His own blood, as her marriage portion, that He might redeem her. All these things tend towards the unity of the one and only true God.”
Source
165
A.D.
Justin Martyr Patristic
A.D. 100–165
“For Isaiah did not send you to a bath, there to wash away murder and other sins, which not even all the water of the sea were sufficient to purge; but, as might have been expected, this was that saving bath of the olden time which followed those who repented, and who no longer were purified by the blood of goats and of sheep, or by the ashes of an heifer, or by the offerings of fine flour, but by faith through the blood of Christ, and through His death, who died for this very reason.”
Source
202
A.D.
Irenaeus Patristic
c. A.D. 130–202
“The sacred books acknowledge with regard to Christ, that as He is the Son of man, so is the same Being not a [mere] man; and as He is flesh, so is He also spirit, and the Word of God, and God. And as He was born of Mary in the last times, so did He also proceed from God as the First-begotten of every creature; and as He hungered, so did He satisfy [others]; and as He thirsted, so did He of old cause the Jews to drink, for the "Rock was Christ" Himself: thus does Jesus now give to His believing people power to drink spiritual waters, which spring up to life eternal. And as He was the son of David, so was He also the Lord of David. And as He was from Abraham, so did He also exist before Abraham. And as He was the servant of God, so is He the Son of God, and Lord of the universe. And as He was spit upon ignominiously, so also did He breathe the Holy Spirit into His disciples. And as He was saddened, so also did He give joy to His people. And as He was capable of being handled and touched, so again did He, in a non-apprehensible form, pass through the midst of those who sought to injure Him, and entered without impediment through closed doors. And as He slept, so did He also rule the sea, the winds, and the storms. And as He suffered, so also is He alive, and life-giving, and healing all our infirmity. And as He died, so is He also the Resurrection of the dead. He suffered shame on earth, while He is higher than all glory and praise in heaven; who, "though He was crucified through weakness, yet He liveth by divine power;" who "descended into the lower parts of the earth," and who "ascended up above the heavens;" for whom a manger sufficed, yet who filled all things; who was dead, yet who liveth for ever and ever. Amen.”
Source
220
A.D.
Tertullian Patristic
c. A.D. 150–220
“For, because Jesus Christ was to introduce the second people (which is composed of us nations, lingering deserted in the world aforetime) into the land of promise, "flowing with milk and honey" (that is, into the possession of eternal life, than which nought is sweeter); and this had to come about, not through Moses (that is, not through the Law's discipline), but through Joshua (that is, through the new law's grace), after our circumcision with "a knife of rock" (that is, with Christ's precepts, for Christ is in many ways and figures predicted as a rock ); therefore the man who was being prepared to act as images of this sacrament was inaugurated under the figure of the Lord's name, even so as to be named Jesus.”
Source
“But why enlarge on such a subject? When the very apostle whom our heretics adopt, interprets the law which allows an unmuzzled mouth to the oxen that tread out the corn, not of cattle, but of ourselves; and also alleges that the rock which followed (the Israelites) and supplied them with drink was Christ; teaching the Galatians, moreover, that the two narratives of the sons of Abraham had an allegorical meaning in their course; and to the Ephesians giving an intimation that, when it was declared in the beginning that a man should leave his father and mother and become one flesh with his wife, he applied this to Christ and the church.”
Source
“But having to be rejected and afterwards to be acknowledged, and taken up and glorified, He borrowed the very word "rejected" from the passage, where, under the figure of a stone, His twofold manifestation was celebrated by David-the first in rejection, the second in honour: "The stone," says He, "which the builders rejected, is become the head-stone of the corner. This is the Lord's doing." Now it would be idle, if we believed that God had predicted the humiliation, or even the glory, of any Christ at all, that He could have signed His prophecy for any but Him whom He had foretold under the figure of a stone, and a rock, and a mountain. If, however, He speaks of His own coming, why does He compare it with the days of Noe and of Lot, which were dark and terrible-a mild and gentle God as He is? Why does He bid us "remember Lot's wife," who despised the Creator's command, and was punished for her contempt, if He does not come with judgment to avenge the infraction of His precepts?”
Source
“For behold Marcion, in his blindness, stumbled at the rock whereof our fathers drank in the wilderness. For since "that rock was Christ," it was, of course, the Creator's, to whom also belonged the people.”
“How, therefore, can such a hydra of delinquencies fail to offend the Lord, the Disapprover of evils? Is it not manifest that it was through impatience that Israel himself also always failed in his duty toward God, from that time when, forgetful of the heavenly arm whereby he had been drawn out of his Egyptian affliction, he demands from Aaron "gods as his guides; "when he pours down for an idol the contributions of his gold: for the so necessary delays of Moses, while he met with God, he had borne with impatience. After the edible rain of the manna, after the watery following of the rock, they despair of the Lord in not enduring a three-days' thirst; for this also is laid to their charge by the Lord as impatience.”
Source
395
A.D.
Gregory of Nyssa Patristic
c. A.D. 335–395
“We also will be a rock, imitating, as far as possible in our changing nature, the unchanging and permanent nature of the Master.”
397
A.D.
Ambrose of Milan Patristic
A.D. 339–397
“This surely referred not to his divinity but to his flesh, which flowed over the hearts of the thirsting people with the perpetual stream of his blood.”
date
unknown
c. A.D. 400
“Meantime they came to Mount Sinai, and thence the law was given to them with voices and sights from heaven, written in ten precepts, of which the first and greatest was that they should worship God Himself alone, and not make to themselves any appearance or form to worship. But when Moses had gone up to the mount, and was staying there forty days, the people, although they had seen Egypt struck with the ten plagues, and the sea parted and passed over by them on foot, manna also given to them from heaven for bread, and drink supplied to them out of the rock that followed [1 Corinthians 10:4] them, which kind of food was turned into whatever taste any one desired; and although, being placed under the torrid region of heaven, they were shaded by a cloud in the day-time, that they might not be scorched by the heat, and by night were enlightened by a pillar of fire, lest the horror of darkness should be added to the wasteness of the wilderness; those very people, I say, when Moses stayed in the mount, made and worshipped a golden calf's head, after the fashion of Apis, whom they had seen worshipped in Egypt; and after so many and so great marvels which they had seen, were unable to cleanse and wash out from themselves the defilements of old habit. On this account, leaving the short road which leads from Egypt to Judaea, Moses conducted them by an immense circuit of the desert, if haply he might be able, as we mentioned before, to shake off the evils of old habit by the change of a new education.”
Source
407
A.D.
John Chrysostom Patristic
A.D. 347–407
“"That our fathers," saith he, "were all under the cloud, and all passed through the sea; and were all baptized unto Moses in the cloud and in the sea; and did all eat the same spiritual meat; and did all drink the same spiritual drink; for they drank of a spiritual Rock that followed them: and the Rock was Christ. Howbeit with most of them God was not well pleased." And wherefore saith he these things? To point out that as they were nothing profited by the enjoyment of so great a gift, so neither these by obtaining Baptism and partaking of spiritual Mysteries, except they go on and show forth a life worthy of this grace. Wherefore also he introduces the types both of Baptism and of the Mysteries. But what is, "They were baptized into Moses?" Like as we, on our belief in Christ and His resurrection, are baptized, as being destined in our own persons to partake in the same mysteries; for, "we are baptized," saith he, "for the dead," i.e., for our own bodies; even so they putting confidence in Moses, i.e., having seen him cross first, ventured also themselves into the waters. But because he wishes to bring the Type near the Truth; he speaks it not thus, but uses the terms of the Truth even concerning the Type. Further: this was a symbol of the Font, and that which follows, of the Holy Table. For as thou eatest the Lord's Body, so they the manna: and as thou drinkest the Blood, so they water from a rock. For though they were things of sense which were produced, yet were they spiritually exhibited, not according to the order of nature, but according to the gracious intention of the gift, and together with the body nourished also the soul, leading it unto faith. On this account, you see, touching the food he made no remark, for it was entirely different, not in mode only but in nature also; (for it was manna;) but respecting the drink, since the manner only of the supply was extraordinary and required proof, therefore having said that "they drank the same spiritual drink," he added, "for they drank of a spiritual Rock that followed them," and he subjoined, "and the Rock was Christ." For it was not the nature of the rock which sent forth the water, (such is his meaning,) else would it as well have gushed out before this time: but another sort of Rock, a spiritual One, performed the whole, even Christ who was every where with them and wrought all the wonders. For on this account he said, "that followed them." Perceivest thou the wisdom of Paul, how in both cases he points out Him as the Giver, and thereby brings the Type nigh to the Truth? "For He who set those things before them," saith he, "the same also hath prepared this our Table: and the same Person both brought them through the sea and thee through Baptism; and before them set manna, but before thee His Body and Blood." As touching His gift then, such is the case: now let us observe also what follows, and consider, whether when they showed themselves unworthy of the gift, He spared them. Nay, this thou canst not say. Wherefore also he added, "Howbeit with most of them God was not well-pleased;" although He had honored them with so great honor. Yea, it profited them nothing, but most of them perished. The truth is, they all perished, but that he might not seem to prophesy total destruction to these also, therefore he said, "most of them." And yet they were innumerable, but their number profited them nothing: and these were all so many tokens of love; but not even did this profit them, inasmuch as they did not themselves show forth the fruits of love. Thus, since most men disbelieve the things said of hell, as not being present nor in sight; he alleges the things heretofore done as a proof that God doth punish all who sin, even though He have bestowed innumerable benefits upon them: "for if ye disbelieve the things to come," so he speaks, "yet surely the things that are past ye will not disbelieve." Consider, for example, how great benefits He bestowed on them: from Egypt and the slavery there He set them free, the sea He made their path, from heaven he brought down manna, from beneath He sent forth strange and marvellous fountains of waters; He was with them every where, doing wonders and fencing them in on every side: nevertheless since they showed forth nothing worthy of this gift, He spared them not, but destroyed them all.”
Source
430
A.D.
Augustine of Hippo Patristic
A.D. 354–430
“All symbols seem in some way to personify the realities of which they are symbols. So, St. Paul says, "The rock was Christ," because the rock in question symbolized Christ.”
date
unknown
c. A.D. 550
“the Apostle says: For they drank of that spiritual rock which followed them, and that rock was Christ; by which he meant that, just as the flood of water from the rock which followed them gave them without stint water to drink, so Christ supplies to us life-giving waters, through the mysteries of which the rock was a type.”
Source
604
A.D.
Gregory the Great Patristic
c. A.D. 540–604
“Paul had doubtless discovered this light in the night of history, when he said, All were baptized in Moses in the cloud and in the sea, and all ate the same spiritual meat, and all drank the same spiritual drink. But they drank of the spiritual Rock that followed them, but the Rock was Christ. If then the Rock represented the Redeemer, why should not blessed Job suggest the type of Him, since he signified in his suffering Him Whom he spake of in his voice?”
Source

Scholastic

c. 1100 – 1500
1270
A.D.
1225–1276
“Above he warned them to abstain from things sacrificed to idols: first, on account of avoiding the scandal of weak brothers, chapter VIII; second, on account of his own example, in that he abstains, for the sake of others, from receiving support, chapter IX. Here, third, he warns to the same end from consideration of the punishment of the Jews who worshiped idols in the desert, where, by the example of their punishment, first he warns to abstain from the perpetration of similar sins; second, specially from the eating of things sacrificed to idols, where: "wherefore, my dearest, flee from the worship of idols," etc. In the first part, first he shows what happened to the Jews of old; second, why — because it did not happen for their own sake only, but for our correction — "now these things were done in a figure of us," etc.; third, that they might beware by their example, he concludes, where: "wherefore let him who thinks himself to stand," etc. Therefore the punishment is to be feared, the cause is to be remembered, and caution is to be applied. In the first part, first he sets forth the benefits of grace bestowed on them while they were in Egypt; second, those granted in the desert, where: "and all ate the same food," etc.; third, the scourges inflicted on account of ingratitude, where: "but with most of them," etc. In the first he touches on three benefits: the first, in the protection of the cloud; the second, in the crossing of the Red Sea, where: "and all passed through the sea," etc.; the third, in the cleansing of Baptism, where: "and all in Moses," etc. He says therefore, "I would not have you," etc., as if to say: one must act thus, just as I have warned. For the sacraments of the Church received do not suffice for you if you afterward sin, just as the benefits of God did not suffice for the Jews either, but they were afterward punished. "For I would not have you ignorant," etc. This is read in two ways: in one way, of the good and the evil in common; in another way, of the evil specially. In the first way, thus: "I would not have you ignorant, brothers, that our fathers" — the founders of our faith — "all," both good and evil, "were under the protecting cloud." Exodus 13:21: "the Lord went before them to show the way by day in a pillar of cloud," etc. Or "under the cloud," that is, under figure and shadow. Hebrews 10:1: "the law, having a shadow of things to come," etc. "And all passed through the Red Sea," their enemies being submerged, not from one bank to the opposite bank, but to the same bank, whence they crossed a certain gulf of the sea. "And all in Moses," that is, under the leadership of Moses, "were baptized in the cloud and in the sea," that is, by those signs that were seen, cleansed from ignorance; or from vices through faith, namely with the Egyptians submerged. Exodus 14:31: "the people feared the Lord, and they believed the Lord and his servant Moses." Or "they were baptized," that is, they received the sign of Baptism. For Baptism consists of water and spirit. John 3:5: "unless one be reborn of water and spirit." Now the cloud was a symbol of the spirit, and the sea of the water, as Damascene says. Then, when he says "and all ate the same spiritual food," etc., after the benefits shown to Israel as it went out of Egypt, here he touches on the benefits shown in the desert. And first, the benefit of the manna; second, the benefit of the water, where: "and all drank the same drink," etc.; third, the wondrous origin of the drink, where: "for they drank," etc.; fourth, the meaning of that origin, where: "now the rock," etc. He says therefore, "and all ate the same spiritual food," namely the manna from heaven. Now he calls it spiritual, though it was bodily, because it was given miraculously; of this it is said in Wisdom 16:20: "you gave them bread from heaven." "And all drank the same spiritual drink," namely water from the rock. Numbers 20:8: "speak to the rock, and it will give you water." He struck the rock, and waters flowed. "For they drank of the spiritual rock," which is called spiritual on account of the miraculous effect, on account of the sign of what was to come. "The rock following them." "Following" is understood in two ways: that is, satisfying their will. Psalm 77:29: "he brought them their desire." For the waters followed them everywhere. Isaiah 48:21: "he brought forth water for them from the rock," etc. Or "following them," that is, signifying the truth that was to follow. "Now the rock was Christ" — not through substance, but through signification. Matthew 21:42: "this is the stone which they rejected," etc. In another way it is read briefly of the good, thus: "I would not have you ignorant, brothers, that our fathers" — the founders of our faith — "all," the good ones, spiritually. Hence he says: "our fathers" — not theirs — "were under the cloud," as before, "and all ate the same spiritual food," that is, the body of Christ understood spiritually in a sign. Hence they ate the same spiritual food, the same, that is, as we, but a different bodily food than we; and this as regards the elders believing in Christ. They ate Christ spiritually, according to that saying: "believe, and you have eaten." "And all drank the same drink," namely the blood of Christ, in a sign. Thus he speaks of the sign and the spiritual drink through faith, not of the bodily one. "For they drank of the spiritual," etc., as before. The food and drink are to be desired, because sufficient; hence he says "all ate" — unfailing, because it is the same; useful, because the drink and food are spiritual: which is noted in the very name "spiritual," etc. Then, when he says "but with most of them," etc., after the benefits he touches on the scourges. And first the offense, second the punishment, where: "for they were laid low." He says therefore, "but with most of them," etc., as if to say: the Jews made use of all these benefits, but "God was not well pleased with most of them" — namely, with those who offended God — but only with two, namely Caleb and Joshua, to whom alone it was granted to obtain the land of promise, Numbers 14:24. Malachi 1:10: "I have no will in you."”
Source

Reformation

c. 1500 – 1650
1637
A.D.
1567–1637
“For they drank of that spiritual rock that followed them . The rock which gave water to the Hebrews was a type of Christ, who is the true Rock from which flowed the blood to quench the heat of our lust. But what is meant by saying that this rock followed the Hebrews ? 1. The Hebrews reply that their tradition, and the Chaldean rendering of Num. xxi. 16, is that this rock miraculously followed the Jews everywhere in the wilderness till they came to Canaan, and supplied them with water. Hence Ephrem renders this, “ They drank of the spiritual rock which came with them;” and Tertullian (de Baptismo , c. ix.) calls this rock their “ companion.” He says : “ This is the water which flowed from the rock which accompanied the people” But farther on he interprets this rock of Christ, who in His Godhead accompanied and led the Hebrews through the wilderness. He says again ( contra Mar cion, lib. iii. c. 5 ) : “He will understand that the rock which accompanied them to supply them with drink was Christ” S. Ambrose, too (in Ps. xxxviii.) says : " There is a shadow in the rock which poured forth water and followed the people. Was not the water from the rock a shadow of the blood of Christy who followed the people , though they fled from Him, that He might give them drink and quench their thirst ', that they might be redeemed and not perish f ” Again, S. Ambrose (de Sacra mentis, lib. v. c. 1) takes the rock to be Christ He says : “ It was no motionless rock which Digitized by v^,ooQle THAT ROCK WAS CHRIST 229 followed the people . Drink , that Christ may follow Thee also” But I should like to have better authorities for this tradition, for it is against it that after this water came from the rock (Num. xx. n), the people murmured again because of the scarcity of water (Num. xxi. 5), and therefore God gave them a well of water (ver. 16). 2. Others soften down the passage and explain it thus : “ The waters which burst forth from the rock flowed for a long time and rushed forth as a torrent, and this stream followed the Hebrews till they came to a place where there was plenty of water. For had it been a supply to last but for one day, the rock would have had to be struck on the next day, and the third, and the fourth, and so on, to get a supply of water.” And this explanation they support by pointing out that the manna is literal manna, and that therefore the rock or the drink spoken are material rock and material drink ; but the objections to the first explanation are equally strong against this. 3. Photius supposes that the word for following simply means serving, and he would paraphrase the verse, “This rock satisfied the thirst of the Hebrews.” But the Greek cannot possibly bear this interpretation. 4. It is better, then, to understand this of the spiritual Rock signified, not the one signifying. The meaning is then : By the power of the Godhead of Christ, which was the spiritual Rock signified by the rock that gave water to the Hebrews, and which was their constant companion in the wilderness, water was given to them from the material rock. It is so explained by S. Chrysostom, Ambrose, Anselm, (Ecumenius. It may be said, By “ spiritual meat ” the Apostle meant manna, not the body of Christ, and by “spiritual drink” he means the water signifying the blood of Christ, not the blood itself ; therefore, by parity of reasoning, the u spiritual rock ” is the actual rock that typified Christ, not Christ Himself. I deny the consequence, for the Apostle in speaking of the Rock inverts the phrase, and passes from the sign to the thing signified. This is evident from his saying in explanation of the Rock, “ That Digitized by v^,ooQle 230 FIRST EPISTLE TO THE Rock was Christ” In other words, “ When I speak of the spiritual Rock, I mean Christ.” What can be clearer? For it was not the material but the spiritual Rock which was Christ : one was type, the other antitype. It may be urged again, that the phrase “They drank of the spiritual Rock,” means that they drank the spiritual or typical drink, for the rock giving this drink was spiritual or typical This would give the connecting idea, and the reason for saying that “ they drank the same spiritual drink,” for the rock was a type of Christ. The answer to this objection is that the sequence of thought is clear enough. The particle for gives the efficient cause of so great a miracle ; in other words, the Hebrews drank of water which served as a type, for Christ was foreshadowed by the rock which gave this water, and He miraculously gave them this typical water in order that they might know and worship Christ giving it ; but this, as the sequel shows, very many of them did not do. The rock that gave the water allegorically stood for Christ, because Christ, like a rock most firm, supports the Church, and was smitten, i.e. f killed, by Moses, ue. % the Jews, with a rod; that is, the Cross poured forth waters, that is, most fruitful streams of grace, to the faithless of contradiction, to the faithful of sanctification. This is especially true of the waters of His blood in the Eucharist, with which He gives us drink in the desert of this life, that, strengthened by them, we may attain to our country in the heavens. See S. John vii. 37 and iv. 14. S. Augustine (< contra Faustum , lib. xvi. c. 15). It may be argued : Some Catholic writers, according to the first explanation given above, say that, as “that Rock was Christ” means that it was typical of Christ, so in the same way it can be said of the Eucharist, that “ this is My body ” means “ this bread is a figure of My body.” But add that the Apostle expressly says that he is speaking of the spiritual, not the material rock. “ They drank of that spiritual Rock,” he says, and “ that spiritual Rock was Christ.” It is called a spiritual Rock, or typical, because it was a type of Christ But Digitized by v^,ooQle THE JEWS AS ENSAMPLES 231 neither Christ nor S. Paul speak then of the Eucharist. S. Paul and all the Evangelists uniformly declare that Christ said, “This is My Body,” not, “This is My spiritual or typical Body.” Secondly, I answer that that explanation of some writers is not a very probable one ; for that spiritual Rock, i.e. f the One signified, was really Christ, not a type of Him. The words of S. Paul clearly say this”
Source

Post-Reformation

c. 1650 – 1900
1771
A.D.
John Gill Reformed
1697–1771
“And did all drink the same spiritual drink,.... By which is meant the water out of the rock, which was typical of the blood of Christ, which is drink indeed, and not figurative, as this was, for which reason it is called spiritual; or of the grace of Christ, often signified by water, both in the Old and New Testament; and is what Moses and the law could not give; for righteousness and life, grace and salvation, could never be had by the works of the law: and very unpromising it was, and is to carnal men, that these should come by a crucified Christ, as it was to the Israelites, that water, in such plenty, should gush out of the rock in Horeb; but as those waters did not flow from thence without the rock being stricken by the rod of Moses, so the communication of the blessings of grace from Christ is through his being smitten by divine justice with the rod of the law; through his being, stricken for the transgressions of his people, and and being made sin, and a curse of the law in their room and stead. And as those waters continued through the wilderness as a constant supply for them, so the grace of Christ is always sufficient for his people; a continual supply is afforded them; goodness and mercy follow them all the days of their lives: for they drank, of that spiritual rock that followed them; by which the apostle means not Christ himself, for he went before them as the angel of God's presence, but the rock that typified him; not that the rock itself removed out of its place, and went after them, but the waters out of the rock ran like rivers, and followed them in the wilderness wherever they went, for the space of eight and thirty years, or thereabout, and then were stopped, to make trial of their faith once more; this was at Kadesh when the rock was struck again, and gave forth its waters, which, as the continual raining of the manna, was a constant miracle wrought for them. And this sense of the apostle is entirely agreeable to the sentiments of the Jews, who say, that the Israelites had the well of water all the forty years (k). The Jerusalem Targum (l) says of the "well given at Mattanah, that it again became unto them violent overflowing brooks, and again ascended to the tops of the mountains, and descended with them into the ancient valleys.'' And to the same purpose the Targum of Jonathan ben Uzziel (m), "that it again ascended with them to the highest mountains, and from the highest mountains it descended with them to the hills, and encompassed the whole camp of Israel, and gave drink to everyone at the gate of his own dwelling place; and from the high mountains it descended with them into the deep valleys.'' Yea, they speak of the rock in much the same language the apostle does, and seem to understand it of the rock itself, as if that really went along with the Israelites in the wilderness. Thus one of their writers (n) on those words, "must we fetch you water out of this rock?" makes this remark: "for they knew it not, , "for that rock went", and remained among the rocks.'' And in another place it is said (o), "that the rock became in the form of a beehive; (elsewhere (p) it is said to be round as a sieve;) and rolled along, , "and came with them", in their journeys; and when the standard bearers encamped, and the tabernacle stood still, the rock came, and remained in the court of the tent of the congregation; and the princes came and stood upon the top of it, and said, ascend, O well, and it ascended.'' Now, though in this account there is a mixture of fable, yet there appears something of the old true tradition received in the Jewish church, which the apostle has here respect to. And the rock was Christ: that is, it signified Christ, it was a type of him. So the Jews (q) say, that the Shekinah is called , "the holy rock"; and Philo the Jew says (r) of this rock, that the broken rock is , "the wisdom of God". Christ may be compared to the rock for his outward meanness in his parentage and education, in his ministry and audience, in his life and death; and for his height also, being made higher than the kings of the earth, than the angels in heaven, and than the heavens themselves; and for shelter and safety from the wrath of God, and from the rage of men; and for firmness, solidity, and strength, which are seen in his upholding all things by his power, in bearing the sins of his people, and the punishment due unto them, in the support of his church, and bearing up his people under all afflictions and temptations, and in preserving them from a total and final falling away: and a rock he appears to be, as he is the foundation of his church and every believer, against which hell and earth can never prevail; and to it he may be likened for duration, his love being immovable, his righteousness everlasting, his salvation eternal, and he, as the foundation of his church, abiding for ever. (k) Jarchi in Numb. xx. 2. (l) In Numb. xxi. 20. (m) In ib. (n) Jarchi in Numb. xx. 10. (o) Bemidbar Rabba, sect. 1. fol. 177. 2. (p) Gloss. in T. Bab. Pesach. fol. 54. 1. (q) Zohar in Num. fol. 87. 4. & Imre Binah in ib. (r) Lib. Allegor. l. 3. p. 1103.”
Source
1832
A.D.
Adam Clarke Methodist
1762–1832
“Spiritual drink - By the βρωμα πνευματικον spiritual meat, and πομα πνευματικον, spiritual drink, the apostle certainly means both meat and drink, which were furnished to the Israelitish assembly miraculously, as well as typically: and he appears to borrow his expression from the Jews themselves, who expressly say הלחם הלז רוחני hallechem hallaz ruchani, that bread was spiritual, and מיים רוחניים היו meyim ruchainiyim haiu, the waters were spiritual. Alschech in legem. fol. 238, to which opinion the apostle seems particularly to refer. See Schoettgen. The spiritual rock that followed them - There is some difficulty in this verse. How could the rock follow them? It does not appear that the rock ever moved from the place where Moses struck it. But to solve this difficulty, it is said that rock here is put, by metonymy, for the water of the rock; and that this water did follow them through the wilderness. This is more likely; but we have not direct proof of it. The ancient Jews, however, were of this opinion, and state that the streams followed them in all their journeyings, up the mountains, down the valleys, etc., etc.; and that when they came to encamp, the waters formed themselves into cisterns and pools; and that the rulers of the people guided them, by their staves, in rivulets to the different tribes and families. And this is the sense they give to Num 21:17 : Spring up, O well, etc. See the places in Schoettgen. Others contend, that by the rock following them we are to understand their having carried of its waters with them on their journeyings. This we know is a common custom in these deserts to the present day; and that the Greek verb ακολουθεω, to follow, has this sense, Bishop Pearce has amply proved in his note on this place. The Jews suppose that the rock itself went with the Israelites, and was present with them in their thirty-eight stations, for only so many are mentioned. See Alschech in legem. fol. 236. And see Schoettgen. Now, though of all the senses already given that of Bishop Pearce is the best, yet it does appear that the apostle does not speak about the rock itself, but of Him whom it represented; namely, Christ: this was the Rock that followed them, and ministered to them; and this view of the subject is rendered more probable by what is said Co1 10:9, that they tempted Christ, and were destroyed by serpents. The same rock is in the vale of Rephidim to the present day; and it bears aboriginal marks of the water that flowed from it in the fissures that appear on its sides. It is one block of fine granite, about seven yards long, five broad, and - high. A fragment of this typical rock now lies before me, brought by a relative of my own, who broke it off, and did not let it pass into any hand till he placed it in mine. See the note on Exo 17:6.”
Source
1863
A.D.
1796–1863
“The material rock was the figure of Christ. He was the spiritual rock, the strength and salvation of those who hope in Him.”
1871
A.D.
1871
“drink-- (Exo 17:6). In Num 20:8, "the beasts" also are mentioned as having drunk. The literal water typified "spiritual drink," and is therefore so called. spiritual Rock that followed them--rather, "accompanied them." Not the literal rock (or its water) "followed" them, as ALFORD explains, as if Paul sanctioned the Jews' tradition (Rabbi Solomon on Num 20:2) that the rock itself, or at least the stream from it, followed the Israelites from place to place (compare Deu 9:21). But Christ, the "Spiritual Rock" (Psa 78:20, Psa 78:35; Deu 32:4, Deu 32:15, Deu 32:18, Deu 32:30-31, Deu 32:37; Isa 28:16; Pe1 2:6), accompanied them (Exo 33:15). "Followed" implies His attending on them to minister to them; thus, though mostly going before them, He, when occasion required it, followed "behind" (Exo 14:19). He satisfied all alike as to their bodily thirst whenever they needed it; as on three occasions is expressly recorded (Exo 15:24-25; Exo 17:6; Num 20:8); and this drink for the body symbolized the spiritual drink from the Spiritual Rock (compare Joh 4:13-14; see on Co1 10:3).”
Source
Modern · 1953 →

The in-app commentary runs from the Fathers to the early-modern record, then stops — that's where the public-domain sources end, not where the reading does. For the modern reading, follow the sources directly.