The interpretation timeline
Psalm 2:7 Douay-Rheims

The Lord hath said to me: Thou art my son, this day have I begotten thee.

A.D. 311 – 1875 12 witnesses 13 excerpts

Patristic

before A.D. 750
311
A.D.
c. A.D. 260–311
“He willed that he who existed before the ages in heaven should be begotten on the earth—that is, that he who was before unknown should be made known. Now, certainly, Christ has never yet been born in those people who have never perceived the manifold wisdom of God—that is, has never been known, has never been manifested, has never appeared to them. But if these also should perceive the mystery of grace, then in them too, when they were converted and believed, he would be born in knowledge and understanding.”
Source
430
A.D.
Augustine of Hippo Patristic
A.D. 354–430
“"The Lord has said unto me, You are My Son, today have I begotten You" [Psalm 2:7]. Although that day may also seem to be prophetically spoken of, on which Jesus Christ was born according to the flesh; and in eternity there is nothing past as if it had ceased to be, nor future as if it were not yet, but present only, since whatever is eternal, always is; yet as "today" intimates presentiality, a divine interpretation is given to that expression, "Today have I begotten You," whereby the uncorrupt and Catholic faith proclaims the eternal generation of the power and Wisdom of God, who is the Only-begotten Son.”
Source
“Begotten from the eternal Father, begotten from eternity, begotten in eternity, with no beginning, with no ending, with no space of extension, because he is what is, because he himself is who is.”
date
unknown
c. A.D. 550
“Paul when he was discoursing in the synagogue of Antioch in Pisidia spoke thus: And we bring you good tidings of the promise made unto the fathers, how that God hath fulfilled the same unto us their children in that he raised up Jesus, as it is also written in the second psalm, Thou art my son, this day have I begotten thee. Paul here, by Christ's having been begotten, understands his resurrection, and he too has decided that the second psalm has been spoken concerning him, as all the Apostles also have affirmed.”
Source

Scholastic

c. 1100 – 1500
1105
A.D.
Rashi Jewish
1040–1105
“I will tell of the decree Said David, “This is an established decree, and [one] that I have received to tell this and to make known.” The Lord said to me through Nathan, Gad, and Samuel. You are My son The head over Israel, who are called “My firstborn son.” And they will endure through you, as is stated concerning Abner (II Sam. 3:18): “for God said, etc., ‘By the hand of My bondsman David shall I deliver...Israel.’” And for their sake, you are before Me as a son because they are all dependent upon you. this day have I for I have enthroned you over them. begotten you to be called My son and to be beloved to Me as a son for their sake, as it is stated (I Chronicles 14:2): ‘And David knew that the Lord had established him as king over Israel, and that his kingdom was highly exalted for the sake of His people Israel.’ And we find that the kings of Israel who were beloved before Him were called sons, as it is stated (II Sam. 7:14) concerning Solomon: “I will be to him a father, and he shall be to Me a son.” We find further concerning David (Ps. 89:27) “He shall call Me, ‘You are my Father, my God, and the Rock of my salvation.’””
Source
1167
A.D.
Ibn Ezra Jewish
1089–1167
“Let me tell (אֲסַפְּרָ֗ה - asapperah): These are the words of David along with his prophecy; or, the words of the poet [who composed the psalm] speaking on his [David's, or the Messiah's] behalf. [Regarding] the decree (אֶֽ֫ל־חֹ֥ק - el chok): [The meaning is:] This which I will tell, I will establish it (asim oto) as a decree (le-chok) that should be related. And this [decree] is: He said to me, "You are My son" – [meaning] to serve HaShem, just as a son honors a father. I have fathered you this day (אֲ֝נִ֗י הַיּ֥וֹם יְלִדְתִּֽיךָ - ani hayom yelidtíkha): This is similar to (Deuteronomy 32:18): "The Rock who fathered you (tzur yeladkha), you forgot."”
Source
1235
A.D.
Radak Jewish
c. 1160–1235
“Let me declare it for a decree: – This is the utterance of David, who says, I will make this declaration a decree and rule. And what is the declaration? That The Lord said unto me, Thou art My son: – and the kingdom has come to me from Him, and therefore let no man stir up strife against it, for the Lord hath chosen me for a son, as He said to Samuel (1 Sam. 16:1): “For I have provided among his sons a king for Myself.” It is as though to say, “This king is Mine and he is My son and servant and obeys Me” – for everyone who is obedient in the service of God He calls His son, just as a son obeys his father and is ready for his service. And so (in the verse) “ye are sons of the Lord your God” (Deut. 14:1), and “I will be his Father and he shall be My son” (2 Sam. 7:14); and it says (Hos. 2:1), “the sons of the living God.” This day have I begotten thee: – The day when he was anointed was the day God took him to Himself for a son, as it says (1 Sam. 16:1), “to Me a king.” And he says, This day have I begotten thee, for on that day there was born in him the spirit of God, as is written (1 Sam. 16:13), “And the spirit of the Lord came mightily upon David from that day and onward.” And from that day onward he gave expression to songs and psalms by the Holy Spirit, which was born in him and imparted to him by God. Moreover, the spirit of might was added to him from that day onward; and so it says (Deut. 32:18), “Of the rock that begat thee thou art unmindful” which made thee great and put wisdom in thine heart and intelligence, in the day of the station at Mount Sinai. And so it says (ibid. 6), “Is not He thy Father that hath bought thee?” For if he had said begotten thee, bought thee in reference to (the act of) creation, this would have been no more true of Israel than the rest of men. Do you not see what he says, “Do ye thus requite the Lord?” (ibid.), meaning, “This is the requital you make Him for all the good He has done to you! Surely He is thy Father who bought thee!” And he says, “Of the rock that begat thee thou art unmindful and hast forgotten the God that gave thee birth” (ibid. 18), just as he says thy Father, for He is to you as a father, and the one that gave thee birth – that is, the mother.”
Source
1273
A.D.
Thomas Aquinas Catholic
1225–1274
“Having set forth the preceding Psalm, in which he described as it were universally the state and course of the human race, he now proceeds in this one to his own proper matter, namely his own tribulations, which signify the tribulations of Christ; and concerning this he does three things. First he implores divine help against imminent tribulations by praying. Second, having been heard, he gives thanks, and this in the eighth Psalm: "O Lord our Lord, how admirable is thy name in the whole earth?" Third he shows the confidence thence conceived, and this in the tenth Psalm: "In the Lord I put my trust: how then do you say to my soul, Get thee away from hence into the mountain like a sparrow?" Now in tribulations a man can ask for two things. First he asks to be freed. Second, that his enemies be brought low; and this he does in the seventh Psalm: "O Lord my God, in thee," and so on. Concerning the first he does two things. First he implores help against those bringing tribulation. Second, against those striving to deceive, and this in the fifth Psalm: "My words," etc. Concerning the first he does three things. First he recalls the machinations of those rising up against him. Second he implores help against those already rising up, and this in the third Psalm: "Lord, why are they multiplied," etc. Third, confident that he has been heard, he invites others to confidence in God; and this in the fourth Psalm: "When I called upon him." But it must be noted that this whole Psalm contains nothing about prayer, but about the malice of those rising up. Concerning this Psalm in general it must be known that there was a twofold opinion about it. For some said that it is the same as the first Psalm; and this was Gamaliel's opinion. And on this account they said that, just as that Psalm begins "Blessed is the man who," etc., so this one, as it were a part of it, ends: "Blessed are all they that trust in him," so that it would be as it were circular. But against this there are two objections. First, because in that case there would not be a hundred and fifty Psalms. But to this it is answered that they add one more, which is found in several Psalters, and it begins, "I was small," etc. And second, because in Hebrew the Psalms are arranged according to the order of the letters, so that it is immediately apparent which number the Psalm is: for in the first there is aleph, to designate that it is the first; in the second there is beth, to designate that it is the second; in the third there is gimel, and so with the others. Since therefore beth, which letter is second in the order of the alphabet, is placed at the beginning of this Psalm, it is clear that it is the second Psalm, and this Augustine holds. It must therefore be said that this Psalm is second in the order of the Psalms, but first in its title; and here is its title. A psalm is properly so called from the psaltery, which is a certain ten-stringed instrument that is touched by hand: whence it is called from "psallere," which is to touch by hand, and it has its touch from above; whence a psalm is properly called a song, which David used to sing, or caused to be sung to the psaltery. Mystically, however, by the ten-stringed psaltery is signified the law of God, which consists in ten precepts, and it must be touched by hand, that is, by good operation, and from above, because the precepts are to be fulfilled on account of the hope of eternal things, otherwise it would be touched from below. It is therefore a psalm of David, because composed by him, and it deals with his kingdom under the figure of the kingdom of Christ. For by David, Christ is fittingly signified, because David is called "strong of hand," and Christ is "the power of God," 1 Corinthians 1. David is also called "desirable in appearance," and Christ is "the brightness of glory," Hebrews 1: "he it is upon whom the angels desire to look," 1 Peter 1. "Why have the Gentiles raged, and the people devised vain things?" This Psalm is divided into two parts. In the first is narrated the machination of those who strive against the kingdom of David and of Christ. In the second is set down their repression, at the place: "he that dwelleth in heaven shall laugh at them." Concerning the first he does three things. First he narrates the rebellion of those who plot. Second, against whom they plot. Third, the purpose of those plotting. The second at the place: "against the Lord." The third at the place: "let us break their bonds asunder." First then it must be known historically that when a people plots rebellion, first a murmur arises among the people, afterward the help of the great ones comes to bring it to completion. First then he sets down the endeavor of the murmuring people. Second, the help of the great ones, at the place: "the kings of the earth stood up, and the princes met together." Now among the people there are some who have less of reason, who are impetuous; some have more, who are called cautious. The first are not moved to rebel by sense, but rather by impulse; and therefore he says of these, "raged," which pertains to beasts: Proverbs 19: "as the roaring of a lion, so also is the anger of a king." The second are moved by deliberation; and therefore of these he says: "devised vain things," because "the thoughts of men are vain," Psalm 93. A people is a multitude of men united by consent to law. And therefore the Jews are called a people, because they are with the law and under the law of God. Others are called "gentes" (nations/Gentiles), because they are not under the law of God. Or, according to the letter: in the kingdom of David there were subjugated Gentiles, and faithful Jews; and both were plotting against him; therefore he says: "why have the Gentiles raged, and the people devised vain things?" He does not ask but rebukes, as at Wisdom 5: "what hath pride profited us? or what advantage hath the boasting of riches brought us?" Likewise, the lesser ones could do nothing by themselves, unless they had the help of the greater; whence he sets down certain ones providing help: first by aiding through power, and as to this he says: "the kings of the earth stood up, and the princes met together, against the Lord, and against his Christ"; as if he said, those "raged," but others "stood up," that is, were present to this malice. Likewise, some provided help by counseling with wisdom; and as to this he says, "met together," namely to take counsel. The text of Jerome has "were dealing together equally." Jeremiah 5: "I will go therefore to the great men, and will speak to them: for they have known the way of the Lord, the judgment of their God," and so on. Then when he says, "against the Lord, and against his Christ," etc., he sets down those who suffer the rebellion. For he shows against whom the rebellion was, namely against the Lord, and against his king: for kings are called "Christs," that is, anointed ones: Psalm 104: "touch ye not my anointed [christos]." Whoever therefore rebels against a king instituted by God, rebels also against God: Romans 13: "he that resisteth the power, resisteth the ordinance of God." And therefore he says, "against the Lord, and against his Christ." Romans 8: "they have not rejected thee, but me." Mystically these things are said under the likeness of David concerning Christ: Acts 4: "Lord, thou hast said by the mouth of our father, thy servant David: why did the Gentiles rage," and so on. "For of a truth there assembled together in this city against thy holy servant Jesus, whom thou hast anointed," and so on. And according to this it must be understood that the Gentiles, namely the soldiers, gathered together against Christ: and the peoples, namely the Jews, "devised vain things," believing that they would kill him utterly, namely that he would not rise again: and the kings of the earth, namely Herod Ascalonita the elder, who killed the infants, and afterward Herod Antipas, his son, who consented with Pilate: and the princes, that is, Pilate, the plural being put for the singular by synecdoche. Or, the princes of the priests "met together," that is, in one depraved will, "against the Lord and against his Christ." Consequently he sets down the purpose of those plotting; whence he says: "let us break their bonds asunder," and so on. This is properly said: for the dominion of a king is called a yoke. 3 Kings 12, it is said to Rehoboam that he should lighten the yoke that Solomon had imposed upon them. For just as oxen are joined to a yoke for work, so men are joined to the dominion of a kingdom. Now the yoke cannot be removed unless the bonds are loosed. Now the bonds in a kingdom are those things by which the royal power is made firm in the kingdom, such as soldiers, fortresses, and arms. First then it is necessary to dissolve these, and then to remove the yoke. Spiritually, in Christ the yoke is the law of charity: Matthew 11: "my yoke is sweet," and so on. The bonds are the virtues, hope, faith, charity: Ephesians 4: "careful to keep the unity of the spirit in the bond of peace." Ecclesiasticus 6: "her bonds are a healthful binding." That therefore the conscience of man should not be under the yoke of the law of Christ cannot be, unless these bonds are broken first: which those do who say to God, "depart from us, we desire not the knowledge of thy ways," and so on, Job 12; Jeremiah 2: "of old time thou hast broken my yoke, thou hast burst my bonds, and thou saidst, I will not serve." Or this is said in the person of David, from Christ to his own servants: the Gloss says, as if they themselves so strive: "but O my own, let us break asunder," etc.; but this does not serve the purpose. Then when he says, "he that dwelleth," is set down the oppression of those plotting against the kingdom of David. And concerning this he does two things. First it is shown how they are oppressed by the Lord. Second, how by his Christ, at the place, "but I am appointed," and so on. Against these, namely against the Lord and against his Christ, they plotted, as has been said. Concerning the first note four things: namely derision, mockery, angry speech, and confounding. For just as some boy of no virtue and power, if he fights against a giant, is derided by the giant, so if someone of no power wishes to strive against him who dwells in the heavens, he is derided by him. Job 35: "Look up to heaven and see, and behold the sky, that it is higher than thee. If thou sin, what shalt thou hurt him?" And if he persists though powerless, then he who is more powerful reproves and mocks. For derision comes about with the mouth open, according to Jerome in the Gloss; but mockery with the nose wrinkled and drawn together, arising as it were from a certain light indignation. Proverbs 1: "I also will laugh in your destruction, and will mock when that shall come to you which you feared." If, however, he in no way desists, he proceeds to vengeance; and therefore he says, "then shall he speak to them in his anger," that is, he will pronounce the sentence of vengeance against them: for anger does not fall upon God; but what belongs to the creature is sometimes attributed to the Creator by anthropopathy, which is a human quasi-passion. Psalm 6: "O Lord, not in thy wrath," and so on. Last of all, the sentence is committed to execution; and therefore he says, "and shall trouble them in his rage," in heart and in soul, in eternal punishment: that is, he will punish them by his power. Job 15: "When he moveth himself to seek bread, he knoweth that the day of darkness is ready at hand: tribulation shall terrify him, and distress shall surround him." These four things will be present at the judgment. For "he shall deride" them, setting them at the left hand: Matthew 25: he shall "mock," saying, "I was hungry," etc. — by reproach. "He shall speak in anger," pronouncing the sentence: "go, ye cursed, into everlasting fire," etc. "He shall trouble them," carrying out the sentence: "these shall go into everlasting punishment," etc. There follows, next, to show how they are held down by his Christ, when he says, "but I." Now David's Christ was risen up against by the people, the Gentiles, and the princes. First then he shows how Christ conducts himself toward the people. Second, how toward the Gentiles, at the place, "the Lord hath said to me." Third, how toward the kings, at the place, "and now, O ye kings, understand," and so on. He says therefore: "but I am appointed king by him over Sion his holy mountain," and so on. Now it must be known that he was appointed king by God in Jerusalem, and by his preaching he brought back the people; as if he said: they do thus, but they cannot have their intention, because I have been appointed, that is, established as king over Sion, that is, over the people of the Jews, who were in Jerusalem, whose citadel is Sion: "by him," namely by God: Psalm 117: "the Lord is my helper, I will not fear what man can do unto me." Job 17: "set me, O Lord, beside thyself, and let any man's hand fight against me." Now I am appointed king over Sion his holy mountain, not for my own sake, but that I might rule the people according to the law of God; and therefore he says, "preaching his commandment." Mystically, however, he is appointed king, according to Jeremiah 23: "a king shall reign, and shall be wise," and so on. "Sion," that is, the Church of the Jews, which is called the holy mountain, because it first received the rays of the sun: Matthew 14: "I was not sent but to the sheep," etc. 2 Kings 19: "do I not know that I am this day made king over Israel?" "Preaching his commandment," that is, the Gospel. Or that special commandment of which it is said, John 13: "a new commandment I give unto you, that you love one another"; and in the same, 15: "this is my commandment," etc. Now this commandment he preached personally to the Jews, that is, in his own person: Matthew 4: "Jesus went about all Galilee, teaching in their synagogues, and preaching the gospel of the kingdom." Romans 5: "now I say that Christ Jesus was minister of the circumcision for the truth of God," and so on. Then when he says, "the Lord," from the same history is shown how he conducts himself toward the Gentiles; and concerning this he does two things. First he shows that it befits Christ to have power over the Gentiles. Second he sets down the exercise of that power, "thou shalt rule them." Concerning the first he does two things. First he shows by what right power belongs to him over the Gentiles. Second he sets down the acceptance of that very power, at the place, "I will give thee the Gentiles." He says therefore, "the Lord hath said to me." This is not fulfilled in every respect with regard to David; and therefore it is understood of Christ, to whom belongs dominion over the Gentiles by a twofold right: namely hereditary, and meritorious. First then he sets down the right. Second, the merit, at the place, "ask," etc. Now Christ is king of all, as is said in Hebrews 1; and this belongs to him because he is Son: Galatians 4: "if a son, an heir also through God"; and therefore he treats of the eternal generation of Christ, in which three things are noted. First, the manner of the generation. Second, the property of sonship. Third, the eternity of the Son generated. The manner is shown in this, that he says, "the Lord hath said," because, namely, he proceeded by way of the intellect. The generation of each thing is according to its manner. The manner of the divine nature is not carnal, but intellectual — nay rather, it is understanding itself. Second, generation is a procession according to origin, which is found in an intelligible thing, which is according to the conception of a word proceeding from the intellect; and this is to speak a word in the heart; and therefore he says, "the Lord hath said," as if to say, by speaking he begot me. Whence the Son is the Word that the Father spoke, that is, produced by begetting. The property, however, is shown in this, that he says, "thou art my Son," not adoptive, as are those of whom it is said, John 1: "he gave them power to become the sons of God," etc., but by the property of nature. Whence "thou art my son" — natural, singular, consubstantial: Matthew 17: "this is my beloved Son." Eternity is set down in this, that he adds: "this day have I begotten thee," that is, eternally: for it is not a new generation, but an eternal one; and therefore he says: "this day have I begotten thee": because "this day" signifies presence, and what is eternal, always is. He also says, "I have begotten thee," and not "I beget," to designate the perfection of the generation: for since generation is without motion, it is at once to be being begotten and to be begotten. He also says "this day," to designate presentiality together with the clarity which befit Christ, who also "inhabiteth light inaccessible," 1 Timothy 6; and who truly is, in whom there is nothing past, or future, or obscure, but all is clear. Above was set down the privilege of the eternal generation, from which dominion over the Gentiles belongs to Christ by hereditary right; here it is shown how he acquired it by his own merit. Here it must be considered that just as in natural things forms are infused according to the disposition of matter, so God bestows gratuitous gifts: Philippians 2: "it is God who worketh in us both to will and to accomplish," etc.; and therefore he wills that we receive gifts by asking and praying: this example he willed to show through Christ, because he willed that he should ask for that which belonged to him by hereditary right. Now this petition on behalf of calling the Gentiles can be understood in two ways. First, through prayer, because he prayed for them: John 17: "not for them only do I pray, but for them also who through their word shall believe in me." Likewise, through his passion: Hebrews 9: "that by means of his death, for the redemption of those transgressions, which were under the former testament, they that are called might receive the promise of eternal inheritance": which petition indeed was not empty, for "he was heard in all things for his reverence," Hebrews 6. Whence the concession is subjoined, when it is added, "and I will give thee the Gentiles." Here it must be noted that no one comes to Christ except by the gift of the Father: John 6: "no man can come to me, except the Father, who hath sent me, draw him." Now the giving of the Gentiles is a pure gift: for the Jews were, as it were, given back, because they had been given before: Romans 15: "I say that Jesus Christ was minister of the circumcision," etc.; and therefore he says: "I will give thee the Gentiles," namely that they may be subjected to thee, and be thy inheritance: Philippians 2: "that in the name of Jesus every knee should bow, of those that are in heaven, on earth, and under the earth": Psalm 115: "my inheritance is goodly to me." Likewise, he does not have them as ministers have them, as Peter or Paul, but as a lord: Hebrews 5: "and Moses indeed was faithful in all his house as a servant, for a testimony of those things which were to be said: but Christ as a son in his own house, which house are we." And therefore he says, "for thy possession": Isaiah 49: "that thou mightest possess the scattered inheritances, that thou mightest say to them that are bound, come forth, and to them that are in darkness, show yourselves: the ends of the earth"; because throughout the whole world the Church has been built. But afterward, through the heretic Nicolaus, and through Mahomet, they returned to unbelief. Or, it is awaited to be founded: Isaiah 49: "it is a small thing that thou shouldst be my servant, to raise up the tribes of Jacob, and to convert the dregs of Israel. Behold I have given thee to be the light of the Gentiles, that thou mayst be my salvation even to the farthest part of the earth": Hebrews 1: "whom he hath appointed heir of all things," and so on. Then when he says, "thou shalt rule them," is set down the execution of the power; and according to history it could be expounded, because he had been appointed king of the Jews, therefore he also had dominion over certain Gentiles whom he had subjugated, in figure of the universal dominion of Christ. But because citizens are ruled otherwise, for citizens are ruled by the rule of mercy, subjugated enemies otherwise, namely by the rule of severe justice; therefore he says: "with a rod of iron." But it is better that this be referred to the spiritual dominion of Christ: for it is necessary that he who rules have a rod: Psalm 44: "a rod of direction, the rod of thy kingdom." For to this end kings are necessary, that they may have the rod of discipline by which they punish offenders. And because Christ has been appointed king by God to rule the people, therefore he says: "thou shalt rule them with a rod of iron." And he adds, "of iron," to designate the inflexible discipline of justice. For the rod by which the Jews were ruled was not of iron, because they frequently shook themselves free by worshipping idols. But this is the rod of iron by which he rules the Gentiles, because they will no longer withdraw from the dominion of Christ, when the fullness of the Gentiles shall have entered in: Apocalypse 12: "the woman brought forth a man child, who was to rule all nations with an iron rod." "And thou shalt break them in pieces like a potter's vessel"; which is explained by that saying, Jeremiah 18: "I went down to the potter's house, and behold he was doing a work on the wheel, and the vessel was broken which he was making of clay with his hands. And turning he made another vessel." And afterward, "as clay is in the hand of the potter, so are you in my hand." For when the potter's vessel is fresh, it is easily broken from a bad shape, and restored into a good one. The Jews were converted, whence they were not to be broken: for their faith and ours is the same. The Gentiles, however, were idolaters; and therefore they were to be broken, that they might receive another shape, that is, another, true faith. Or otherwise: "with a rod of iron," namely the good, and "like a potter's vessel," the wicked, who are finally to be ground to pieces: Luke 2: "behold this child is set for the fall, and for the resurrection of many": Isaiah 30: "suddenly, when it is not looked for, the destruction thereof shall come, and it shall be broken small like the breaking of the potter's vessel, with a mighty breaking," etc., so that thus "he that is just, let him be justified still: and he that is filthy, let him be filthy still," Apocalypse, at the end. Then when he says, "and now," it is shown how he conducts himself toward kings. Now he holds them down by admonishing and by drawing them to the service of God. Concerning this therefore he does two things. First he sets down the admonition. Second he assigns the reason for the admonition, at the place, "lest at any time he be angry." Now he admonishes to three things: to the truth of doctrine, to the humility of service, to the acceptance of correction. The second, at the place, "serve." The third, at the place, "embrace." Now truth can be known by someone in two ways: either through discoveries, and such are called those who understand well; or through instruction, and such are called those who are well teachable. Likewise there is a twofold grade of those who rule. For to some is committed universal government, and they are called kings. To others, some special judgment, and these are called judges. The first therefore he exhorts to understanding: for "he that understandeth shall possess governments," Proverbs 1. The second, to being instructed, namely that they may receive the form of judgment from others; and therefore he says, "understand, and receive instruction": Wisdom 6: "hear, O ye kings, and understand: learn, ye that are judges of the ends of the earth." Then when he says, "serve": after understanding he fittingly sets down service, because the service of God, which is latria, is a profession of faith. And therefore first it is necessary that one believe, and afterward confess and serve: Romans 10: "with the heart we believe unto justice: but with the mouth," etc. Now he says "the Lord": for he who serves a man, it suffices that he be subjected to him outwardly by obeying; but he who serves God must be subjected to him inwardly according to the soul, having a good affection: Psalm 61: "Now my soul shall be subject to God," etc. Now he says "with fear," which remains holy and does not permit sin, "so that he that thinketh himself to stand, take heed lest he fall," Romans 10. And it must be noted, according to Augustine, that a king serves God insofar as he is a man, by living justly in himself, but insofar as he is a king, by enacting laws against those things which are contrary to the justice of God: whence in this Psalm the state of the Church is prefigured: for from the beginning the kings of the earth made laws against Christ and Christians, but afterward they established laws in favor of Christ. And the first is shown when he said, "they stood up"; the second, at the place, "serve the Lord." But lest this service should seem a misery, he added: "and rejoice unto him with trembling." Because the fear of the Lord is not a matter of misery, but of joy: on account of which, Leviticus 10, Aaron answered Moses, how could things please God with a mournful mind? But lest this joy should carry presumption or negligence, therefore he subjoins, "with trembling," which is a sudden fear: Philippians 2: "with fear and trembling work out your salvation." Consequently he admonishes to acceptance, when he adds, "embrace": so that no one live as he pleases, but as is fitting. And therefore he says "discipline," that is, precepts and good morals, or adversities, as it were a defense and a fortification: Psalm 17: "and thy discipline," etc. And the reason for the admonition is given, "lest at any time he be angry": and there is a twofold reason: to avoid punishment, and to attain glory, at the place, "blessed are all they that trust in him." Now he says "at any time," on account of the patience of God, because in this age he bears with them long: Psalm 7: "will he then be angry every day?" Saying: "unless you be converted"; as if he said, keep the admonition, lest the time of punishment come. "Lest you perish from the just way," namely of justice and of the fellowship of the good, which is exceedingly painful for those who have tasted the sweetness of justice. The text of Jerome has, "perish from the way"; "just" is not there. For when a man is in the world, he is as it were on the way: for if he falls, he can rise again. Nor is that said to perish which can be repaired, even that which does not fall from the way, but on the way. But if he perishes from the way, he is irreparable, Job 5. And because no one understands, they will perish forever. And therefore he says, "when." Another reason is given, which is for attaining glory; as if he said, "embrace discipline," because "when his wrath shall be kindled," etc., "blessed are all they that trust in him." He says well "when it shall be kindled": for now he does not burn, when he chastises as a father; but in the future he will consume and burn, when he shall punish with eternal punishment, Isaiah 30: "behold the name of the Lord cometh from afar, his wrath burneth, and is heavy to bear: his lips are filled with indignation, and his tongue as a devouring fire." Now he says "in a short time," because he will not examine sins one by one separately, but all together at once. Whence that judgment will take place in a short time, and will not last a thousand years, as Lactantius said: 1 Corinthians 15: "in a moment, in the twinkling of an eye, at the last trumpet": and then all the good will be changed into the glory of immortality: whence, "blessed are they that trust in him"; as if he said: vengeance will not merely not touch those who trust, but they will be blessed, because they will come to the kingdom; which beatitude or glory will appear greater from the punishment of the wicked: Jeremiah 17: "blessed is the man that trusteth in the Lord, and the Lord shall be his confidence," and so on. On to Psalm 3.”

Post-Reformation

c. 1650 – 1900
1714
A.D.
Matthew Henry Reformed
1662–1714
“We have heard what the kings of the earth have to say against Christ's kingdom, and have heard it gainsaid by him that sits in heaven; let us now hear what the Messiah himself has to say for his kingdom, to make good his claims, and it is what all the powers on earth cannot gainsay. I. The kingdom of the Messiah is founded upon a decree, an eternal decree, of God the Father. It was not a sudden resolve, it was not the trial of an experiment, but the result of the counsels of the divine wisdom and the determinations of the divine will, before all worlds, neither of which can be altered - the precept or statute (so some read it), the covenant or compact (so others), the federal transactions between the Father and the Son concerning man's redemption, represented by the covenant of royalty made with David and his seed, Psa 89:3. This our Lord Jesus often referred to as that which, all along in his undertaking, he governed himself by; This is the will of him that sent me, Joh 6:40. This commandment have I received of my Father, Joh 10:18; Joh 14:31. II. There is a declaration of that decree as far as is necessary for the satisfaction of all those who are called and commanded to yield themselves subjects to this king, and to leave those inexcusable who will not have him to reign over them. The decree was secret; it was what the Father said to the Son, when he possessed him in the beginning of his way, before his works of old; but it is declared by a faithful witness, who had lain in the bosom of the Father from eternity, and came into the world as the prophet of the church, to declare him, Joh 1:18. The fountain of all being is, without doubt, the fountain of all power; and it is by, from, and under him, that the Messiah claims. He has his right to rule from what Jehovah said to him, by whose word all things were made and are governed. Christ here makes a tow-fold title to his kingdom: - 1. A title by inheritance (Psa 2:7): Thou art my Son, this day have I begotten thee. This scripture the apostle quotes (Heb 1:5) to prove that Christ has a more excellent name than the angels, but that he obtained it by inheritance, Psa 2:4. He is the Son of God, not by adoption, but his begotten Son, the only begotten of the Father, Joh 1:14. And the Father owns him, and will have this declared to the world as the reason why he is constituted King upon the holy hill of Zion; he is therefore unquestionably entitled to, and perfectly qualified for, that great trust. He is the Son of God, and therefore of the same nature with the Father, has in him all the fulness of the godhead, infinite wisdom, power, and holiness. The supreme government of the church is too high an honour and too hard an undertaking for any mere creature; none can be fit for it but he who is one with the Father and was from eternity by him as one brought up with him, thoroughly apprized of all his counsels, Pro 8:30. He is the Son of God, and therefore dear to him, his beloved Son, in whom he is well pleased; and upon this account we are to receive him as a King; for because the Father loveth the Son he hath given all things into his hand, Joh 3:35; Joh 5:20. Being a Son, he is heir of all things, and, the Father having made the worlds by him, it is easy to infer thence that by him also he governs them; for he is the eternal Wisdom and the eternal Word. If God hath said unto him, "Thou art my Son," it becomes each of us to say to him, "Thou art my Lord, my sovereign." Further, to satisfy us that his kingdom is well-grounded upon his sonship, we are here told what his sonship is grounded on: This day have I begotten thee, which refers both to his eternal generation itself, for it is quoted (Heb 1:5) to prove that he is the brightness of his Father's glory and the express image of his person (Psa 2:3), and to the evidence and demonstration given of it by his resurrection from the dead, for to that also it is expressly applied by the apostle, Act 13:33. He hath raised up Jesus again, as it is written, Thou art my Son, this day have I begotten thee. It was by the resurrection from the dead, that sign of the prophet Jonas, which was to be the most convincing of all, that he was declared to be the Son of God with power, Rom 1:4. Christ is said to be the first-begotten and first-born from the dead, Rev 1:5; Col 1:18. Immediately after his resurrection he entered upon the administration of his mediatorial kingdom; it was then that he said, All power is given unto me, and to that especially he had an eye when he taught his disciples to pray, Thy kingdom come. 2. A title by agreement, Psa 2:8, Psa 2:9. The agreement is, in short, this: the Son must undertake the office of an intercessor, and, upon that condition, he shall have the honour and power of a universal monarch; see Isa 53:12, Therefore will I divide him a portion with the great, because he made intercession for the transgressors. He shall be a priest upon his throne, and the counsel of peace shall be between them both, Zac 6:13. (1.) The Son must ask. This supposes his putting himself voluntarily into a state of inferiority to the Father, by taking upon him the human nature; for, as God, he was equal in power and glory with the Father and had nothing to ask. It supposes the making of a satisfaction by the virtue of which the intercession must be made, and the paying of a price, on which this large demand was to be grounded; see Joh 17:4, Joh 17:5. The Son, in asking the heathen for his inheritance, aims, not only at his own honour, but at their happiness in him; so that he intercedes for them, ever lives to do so, and is therefore able to save to the uttermost. (2.) The Father will grant more than to the half of the kingdom, even to the kingdom itself. It is here promised him, [1.] That his government shall be universal: he shall have the heathen for his inheritance, not the Jews only, to whose nation the church had been long confined, but the Gentiles also. Those in the uttermost parts of the earth (as this nation of ours) shall be his possession, and he shall have multitudes of willing loyal subjects among them. Baptized Christians are the possession of the Lord Jesus; they are to him for a name and a praise. God the Father gives them to him when by his Spirit and grave he works upon them to submit their necks to the yoke of the Lord Jesus. This is in part fulfilled; a great part of the Gentile world received the gospel when it was first preached, and Christ's throne was set up there where Satan's seat had long been. But it is to be yet further accomplished when the kingdoms of this world shall become the kingdoms of the Lord and of his Christ, Rev 11:15. Who shall live when God doeth this? [2.] That it shall be victorious: Thou shalt break them (those of them that oppose thy kingdom) with a rod of iron, Psa 2:9. This was in part fulfilled when the nation of the Jews, those that persisted in unbelief and enmity to Christ's gospel, were destroyed by the Roman power, which was represented (Dan 2:40) by feet of iron, as here by a rod of iron. It had a further accomplishment in the destruction of the Pagan powers, when the Christian religion came to be established; but it will not be completely fulfilled till all opposing rule, principality, and power, shall be finally put down, Co1 15:24; Psa 110:5, Psa 110:6. Observe, How powerful Christ is and how weak the enemies of his kingdom are before him; he has a rod of iron wherewith to crush those that will not submit to his golden sceptre; they are but like a potter's vessel before him, suddenly, easily, and irreparably dashed in pieces by him; see Rev 2:27. "Thou shalt do it, that is, thou shalt have leave to do it." Nations shall be ruined, rather than the gospel church shall not be built and established. I have loved thee, therefore will I give men for thee, Isa 43:4. "Thou shalt have power to do it; none shall be able to stand before thee; and thou shalt do it effectually." Those that will not bow shall break. In singing this, and praying it over, we must give glory to Christ as the eternal Son of God and our rightful Lord, and must take comfort from this promise, and plead it with God, that the kingdom of Christ shall be enlarged and established and shall triumph over all opposition.”
1771
A.D.
John Gill Reformed
1697–1771
“I will declare the decree,.... These are the words of Jehovah's Anointed and King, exercising his kingly office, according to the decree and commandment of the Father: for these words refer not to the following, concerning the generation of the Son, which does not depend on the decree and arbitrary will of God, but is from his nature; but these words relate to what go before. The Septuagint, Vulgate Latin, and Oriental versions, place this clause at the end of Psa 2:6; some render it, "declaring his commandment", or "the commandment of the Lord"; the laws that he would have observed, both by him and by the subjects of his kingdom. The Syriac and Arabic versions, "that he might declare the commandment of the Lord"; as if this was the end of his being appointed King. The word is differently rendered; by many, "the decree", the purpose of God concerning Christ as Mediator, and the salvation of his people by him; and who so fit to declare this as he who lay in the bosom of the Father, and was privy to all his secret thoughts and designs, and in when the eternal purpose was purposed. Joh 1:18. The Chaldee paraphrase renders it by "the covenant", the everlasting covenant of grace; and who so proper to declare this as he with whom the covenant was made, and who is the covenant itself, in whom all the blessings and promises of it are, and the messenger of it. Mal 3:1. It may not be unfitly applied to the Gospel, which is the sum and substance of both the decree and covenant of God; it is what was ordained before the world for our glory. This Christ was appointed to preach, and did declare it in the great congregation; the same with the counsel of God, Act 20:27. The words will bear to be rendered, "I will declare" "to the command" (h); or according to the order and rule prescribed by Jehovah, without adding to it or taking from it: agreeably to which he executed his office as King, and Prophet also. The doctrine was not his own, but his Father's he preached; he spake not of himself, but as he taught and enjoined him; the Father gave him commandment what he should say and speak, Joh 12:49; and he kept close to it, as he here says he would: and he ruled in his name, and by his authority, according to the law of his office; and which might be depended upon from the dignity of his person, which qualified him both for his kingly and prophetic offices, expressed in the following words: the Lord hath said unto me, thou art my Son; not by creation, as angels and men; nor by adoption, as saints; nor by office, as civil magistrates; nor on account of his incarnation or resurrection; nor because of the great love of God unto him; but in such a way of filiation as cannot be said of any creature nor of any other, Heb 1:5; He is the true, proper, natural, and eternal Son of God, and as such declared, owned, and acknowledged by Jehovah the Father, as in these words; the foundation of which relation lies in what follows: this day have I begotten thee; which act of begetting refers not to the nature, nor to the office, but the person of Christ; not to his nature, not to his divine nature, which is common with the Father and Spirit; wherefore if his was begotten, theirs must be also: much less to his human nature, in which he is never said to be begotten, but always to be made, and with respect to which he is without father: nor to his office as Mediator, in which he is not a Son, but a servant; besides, he was a Son previous to his being Prophet, Priest, and King; and his office is not the foundation of his sonship, but his sonship is the foundation of his office; or by which that is supported, and which fits him for the performance of it: but it has respect to his person; for, as in human generation, person begets person, and like begets like, so in divine generation; but care must be taken to remove all imperfection from it, such as divisibility and multiplication of essence, priority and posteriority, dependence, and the like: nor can the "modus" or manner of it be conceived or explained by us. The date of it, "today", designs eternity, as in Isa 43:13, which is one continued day, an everlasting now. And this may be applied to any time and case in which Christ is declared to be the Son of God; as at his incarnation, his baptism, and transfiguration upon the mount, and his resurrection from the dead, as it is in Act 13:33; because then he was declared to be the Son of God with power, Rom 1:4; and to his ascension into heaven, where he was made Lord and Christ, and his divine sonship more manifestly appeared; which seems to be the time and case more especially referred to here, if it be compared with Heb 1:3. (h) Heb. "ad decretum", Michaelis, Piscator; "juxta vel secundum statutum", Musculus, Gejerus; "praescriptum et modum certum", Cocceius.”
Source
1849
A.D.
1774–1849
“Thee. Chaldean weakens this text. (Haydock) — “I love thee as my son, and look upon thee with the same affection, as if I had this day created thee;” which might be applied to David, now settled more firmly on the throne by his late victory. But it literally refers to Christ, either born in time, (ver. 1., St. Augustine; Calmet) or baptized; (St. Justin Martyr) or rather rising again, (Acts xiii. 33.) and born from all eternity, Hebrews i. 5. This shews him superior to the angels. The prophet had both these events in view. Eternity is always the same. (Berthier; Bossuet; Du Hamel) — He to whom God may speak thus to-day, at all times, must be God also. (Robertson, Lexic.) (John v. 25.) — To this Socinians can make no reply, without giving up the Epistle to the Hebrews or allowing that the apostle’s arguments were inconclusive. (Berthier) — The same text may thus have many literal senses. (Du Hamel) — The eternal birth seems here to be the chief, as from that source the nativity, baptism, priesthood, (Hebrews xv. 5.[v. 5.?]) and miraculous resurrection of Christ, necessarily spring. (Haydock)”
Source
1871
A.D.
1871
“The king thus constituted declares the fundamental law of His kingdom, in the avowal of His Sonship, a relation involving His universal dominion. this day have I begotten thee--as Sa2 7:14, "he shall be My son," is a solemn recognition of this relation. The interpretation of this passage to describe the inauguration of Christ as Mediatorial King, by no means impugns the Eternal Sonship of His divine nature. In Act 13:33, Paul's quotation does not imply an application of this passage to the resurrection; for "raised up" in Act 13:32 is used as in Act 2:30; Act 3:22, &c., to denote bringing Him into being as a man; and not that of resurrection, which it has only when, as in Act 2:34, allusion is made to His death (Rom 1:4). That passage says He was declared as to His divine nature to be the Son of God, by the resurrection, and only teaches that that event manifested a truth already existing. A similar recognition of His Sonship is introduced in Heb 5:5, by these ends, and by others in Mat 3:17; Mat 17:5.”
Source
1875
A.D.
Keil & Delitzsch Lutheran
1861–1875
“The Anointed One himself now speaks and expresses what he is, and is able to do, by virtue of the divine decree. No transitional word or formula of introduction denotes this sudden transition from the speech of Jahve to that of His Christ. The psalmist is the seer: his Psalm is the mirrored picture of what he saw and the echo of what he heard. As Jahve in opposition to the rebels acknowledges the king upon Zion, so the king on Zion appeals to Him in opposition to the rebels. The name of God, יהוה, has Rebia magnum and, on account of the compass of the full intonation of this accent, a Gaja by the Sheb (comp. אלהי Psa 25:2, אלהים Psa 68:8, אדני Psa 90:1). (Note: We may observe here, in general, that this Gaja (Metheg) which draws the Sheb into the intonation is placed even beside words with the lesser distinctives Zinnor and Rebia parvum only by the Masorete Ben-Naphtali, not by Ben-Asher (both about 950 a.d.). This is a point which has not been observed throughout even in Baer's edition of the Psalter so that consequently e.g., in Psa 5:11 it is to be written אלהים; in Psa 6:2 on the other hand (with Dech) יהוה, not יהוה.) The construction of ספּר with אל (as Psa 69:27, comp. אמר Gen 20:2; Jer 27:19, דּבּר Ch2 32:19, הודיע Isa 38:19): to narrate or make an announcement with respect to... is minute, and therefore solemn. Self-confident and fearless, he can and will oppose to those, who now renounce their allegiance to him, a חק, i.e., an authentic, inviolable appointment, which can neither be changed nor shaken. All the ancient versions, with the exception of the Syriac, read חק־יהוה together. The line of the strophe becomes thereby more symmetrical, but the expression loses in force. אל־חק rightly has Olewejored. It is the amplificative use of the noun when it is not more precisely determined, known in Arabic grammar: such a decree! majestic as to its author and its matter. Jahve has declared to Him: בּני אתּה, (Note: Even in pause here אתּה remains without a lengthened ā (Psalter ii. 468), but the word is become Milel, while out of pause, according to Ben-Asher, it is Milra; but even out of pause (as in Psa 89:10, Psa 89:12; Psa 90:2) it is accented on the penult. by Ben-Naphtali. The Athnach of the books תאם (Ps., Job, Prov.), corresponding to the Zakeph of the 21 other books, has only a half pausal power, and as a rule none at all where it follows Olewejored, cf. Psa 9:7; Psa 14:4; Psa 25:7; Psa 27:4; Psa 31:14; Psa 35:15, etc. (Baer, Thorath Emeth p. 37).) and that on the definite day on which He has begotten or born him into this relationship of son. The verb ילד (with the changeable vowel i) (Note: The changeable i goes back either to a primary form ילד, ירשׁ, שׁאל, or it originates directly from Pathach; forms like ירשׁוּה and שׁאלך favour the former, ē in a closed syllable generally going over into Segol favours the latter.)) unites in itself, like γεννᾶν, the ideas of begetting and bearing (lxx γεγέννηκα, Aq. ἔτεκον); what is intended is an operation of divine power exalted above both, and indeed, since it refers to a setting up (נסך) in the kingship, the begetting into a royal existence, which takes place in and by the act of anointing (משׁח). Whether it be David, or a son of David, or the other David, that is intended, in any case 2 Sam 7 is to be accounted as the first and oldest proclamation of this decree; for there David, with reference to his own anointing, and at the same time with the promise of everlasting dominion, receives the witness of the eternal sonship to which Jahve has appointed the seed of David in relation to Himself as Father, so that David and his seed can say to Jahve: אבי אתּה, Thou art my Father, Psa 89:27, as Jahve can to him: בּני אתּה, Thou art My son. From this sonship of the Anointed one to Jahve, the Creator and Possessor of the world, flows His claim to and expectation of the dominion of the world. The cohortative, natural after challenges, follows upon שׁאל, Ges. 128, 1. Jahve has appointed the dominion of the world to His Son: on His part therefore it needs only the desire for it, to appropriate to Himself that which is allotted to Him. He needs only to be willing, and that He is willing is shown by His appealing to the authority delegated to Him by Jahve against the rebels. This authority has a supplement in Psa 2:9, which is most terrible for the rebellious ones. The suff. refer to the גּוים, the ἔθνη, sunk in heathenism. For these his sceptre of dominion (Psa 90:2) becomes a rod of iron, which will shatter them into a thousand pieces like a brittle image of clay (Jer 19:11). With נפּץ alternates רעע (= רעץ frangere), fut. תּרע; whereas the lxx (Syr., Jer.), which renders ποιμανεῖς αὐτοὺς ἐν ῥάβδῳ (as Co1 4:21) σιδηρᾷ, points it תּרעם from רעה. The staff of iron, according to the Hebrew text the instrument of punitive power, becomes thus with reference to שׁבט as the shepherd's staff Psa 23:4; Mic 7:14, an instrument of despotism.”
Source
Modern · 1953 →

The in-app commentary runs from the Fathers to the early-modern record, then stops — that's where the public-domain sources end, not where the reading does. For the modern reading, follow the sources directly.